Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27382180›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Spectral discrimination in color blind animals via chromatic aberration and pupil shape.

Alexander L Stubbs, Christopher W Stubbs

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
22.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advanced visual components inspired by animal eyes.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Editorial: Vision in Cephalopods: Part II.Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Sensorial Hierarchy inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The Pupillary Response of the Common Octopus (Frontiers in physiology · 2020
    Article
  15. The Eye of the Common Octopus (Frontiers in physiology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Dynamic Skin Patterns in Cephalopods.Frontiers in physiology · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander L StubbsMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; astubbs@berkeley.edu.
Christopher W StubbsDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; Department of Astronomy, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Harvard University · USMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a mechanism by which organisms with only a single photoreceptor, which have a monochromatic view of the world, can achieve color discrimination. An off-axis pupil and the principle of chromatic aberration (where different wavelengths come to focus at different distances behind a lens) can combine to provide "color-blind" animals with a way to distinguish colors. As a specific example, we constructed a computer model of the visual system of cephalopods (octopus, squid, and cuttlefish) that have a single unfiltered photoreceptor type. We compute a quantitative image quality budget for this visual system and show how chromatic blurring dominates the visual acuity in these animals in shallow water. We quantitatively show, through numerical simulations, how chromatic aberration can be exploited to obtain spectral information, especially through nonaxial pupils that are characteristic of coleoid cephalopods. We have also assessed the inherent ambiguity between range and color that is a consequence of the chromatic variation of best focus with wavelength. This proposed mechanism is consistent with the extensive suite of visual/behavioral and physiological data that has been obtained from cephalopod studies and offers a possible solution to the apparent paradox of vivid chromatic behaviors in color blind animals. Moreover, this proposed mechanism has potential applicability in organisms with limited photoreceptor complements, such as spiders and dolphins.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBiological MimicryCephalopodaColorColor Vision DefectsOpsinsPigmentationPupilOpsinscephalopodchromatic aberrationcolor visionpupil shapespectral discrimination

Identifiers

PMID27382180
PMCPMC4961147
OpenAlexW2474496820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.