Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27381849›Full record

ReviewTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2016

Genetically modified (GM) crops: milestones and new advances in crop improvement.

Ayushi Kamthan, Abira Chaudhuri, Mohan Kamthan, Asis Datta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Robust soybean leaf agroinfiltration.Plant cell reports · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ayushi KamthanNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Abira ChaudhuriNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Mohan KamthanNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Asis DattaNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India. asis_datta@rediffmail.com.
National Institute of Plant Genome Research · INIndian Institute of Toxicology Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageNew advances in crop genetic engineering can significantly pace up the development of genetically improved varieties with enhanced yield, nutrition and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Genetically modified (GM) crops can act as powerful complement to the crops produced by laborious and time consuming conventional breeding methods to meet the worldwide demand for quality foods. GM crops can help fight malnutrition due to enhanced yield, nutritional quality and increased resistance to various biotic and abiotic stresses. However, several biosafety issues and public concerns are associated with cultivation of GM crops developed by transgenesis, i.e., introduction of genes from distantly related organism. To meet these concerns, researchers have developed alternative concepts of cisgenesis and intragenesis which involve transformation of plants with genetic material derived from the species itself or from closely related species capable of sexual hybridization, respectively. Recombinase technology aimed at site-specific integration of transgene can help to overcome limitations of traditional genetic engineering methods based on random integration of multiple copy of transgene into plant genome leading to gene silencing and unpredictable expression pattern. Besides, recently developed technology of genome editing using engineered nucleases, permit the modification or mutation of genes of interest without involving foreign DNA, and as a result, plants developed with this technology might be considered as non-transgenic genetically altered plants. This would open the doors for the development and commercialization of transgenic plants with superior phenotypes even in countries where GM crops are poorly accepted. This review is an attempt to summarize various past achievements of GM technology in crop improvement, recent progress and new advances in the field to develop improved varieties aimed for better consumer acceptance.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalDisease ResistanceFood StorageGenetic EngineeringNutritive ValuePlant DiseasesPlants, Genetically ModifiedStress, PhysiologicalTransgenes

Identifiers

PMID27381849
OpenAlexW2461366823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.