Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27381753›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2016

Factors Explaining Variation in Alcohol Use Disorder Prevalence Across Border and Nonborder Communities in Texas.

Sarah E Zemore, Cheryl J Cherpitel, Yu Ye, Guilherme Borges, Libo Li, Lynn S Wallisch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah E ZemoreAlcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA.
Cheryl J CherpitelAlcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA.
Yu YeAlcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA.
Guilherme BorgesDirección de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas y Psicosociales and Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente, Mexico City, Mexico.
Libo LiAlcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA.
Lynn S WallischAddiction Research Institute, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.
Alcohol Research Group · USPublic Health Institute · USTexas Research Institute · USUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana · MX

Funding

TREND &STRUCTURE OF ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE--GENERAL POPULATION 1990 SURVEY DATAP50AA005595 · NIAAA · WESTERN CONSORTIUM FOR PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LUI, CAMILLIA K. · 1985 to 2025
$34.1M
Epidemiology of Drinking and Disorders in Border vs. Non-Border ContextsR01AA018365 · NIAAA · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI BORGES, GUILHERME LUIZ GUIMARAES, CHERPITEL, CHERYL J · 2009 to 2013
$2.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA005595NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundU.S. border populations have been found to be at high risk for alcohol problems. However, results from the U.S.-Mexico Study on Alcohol and Related Conditions (UMSARC) revealed surprisingly large variation in alcohol outcomes even among Texas border sites, with alcohol use disorder (AUD) prevalence ~1.5 to 1.6 times greater in the border city of Laredo compared to both San Antonio and the border site of McAllen/Brownsville. Because a better understanding of this variation is important to identifying environmental influences on AUD, we developed and tested a conceptual model addressing variation in AUD prevalence across Texas UMSARC sites.

methodsSurveys involved in-person, household interviews with Mexican-origin residents of the Texas border cities Laredo (n = 751) and McAllen/Brownsville (n = 814), with San Antonio as an off-border comparison (n = 771). Interviews assessed past-year DSM-5 AUD; past-year heavy drinking; coping and enhancement motives; and 7 indicators of substance use climate and stress exposure hypothesized to mediate site effects. Analyses, conducted separately by gender, included regressions and structural equation modeling with Mplus.

resultsPreliminary analyses revealed that site effects on AUD prevalence were, unexpectedly, exclusive to men, and that Laredan men were similar to McAllen/Brownsville men on demographics, acculturation, and cross-border mobility. However, sites differed dramatically on most of the hypothesized risk factors. Structural equation models confirmed that site effects on AUD were partially mediated via effects of site on indicators of a permissive climate (i.e., permissive drinking norms, high drug availability) and stress exposures (i.e., high exposure to violence/crime, low family support), and via downstream effects on drinking motives and heavy drinking.

conclusionsFindings of very high rates of past-12-month AUD among Laredan men (35%) suggest the possibility of significant heterogeneity even within demographically similar border areas and underline the need for additional study of the border region. Findings regarding our conceptual model suggest that this model may constitute a useful initial framework for future research on alcohol problems at the border. However, additional research using representative samples is needed to confirm and expand this model to comprehensively address relevant individual and community factors.

Indexed as

AcculturationEmigration and ImmigrationResidence CharacteristicsAlcohol-Related DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMexican AmericansMexicoPrevalenceRandom AllocationStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTexasAlcohol DependenceDisparitiesHispanicImmigrationLatino

Identifiers

PMID27381753
PMCPMC4961595
OpenAlexW2467697488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.