SynthesisCancer research2016
Efficacy and Mechanisms of Aerobic Exercise on Cancer Initiation, Progression, and Metastasis: A Critical Systematic Review of In Vivo Preclinical Data.
Synthesis in Cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07267000 (EXERCISE AND THE IMMUNE RESPONSE IN LUNG CANCER), which is not on this map. Cited by 129 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Exercise and the immune response in lung cancer
Who cites it
129 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 204 citations in OpenAlex.
- Food-derived dihydromyricetin and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of Exercise or Diet or Combined Interventions on Treatment Efficacy of Chemotherapy for Cancer: A Systematic Review.Current nutrition reports · 2025Pooled it
- Optimal exercise dose-response improves health-related quality of life in cancer survivors: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of RCTs.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Physical Activity and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Pooled it
- The effect of aerobic exercise on tumour blood delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Pooled it
- What has preclinical systematic review ever done for us?BMJ open science · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of Exercise on Cancer Treatment Efficacy: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies.Cancer research · 2021Pooled it
- Supervised Physical Training Enhances Muscle Strength but Not Muscle Mass in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Androgen Deprivation Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Pooled it
- Real-world feasibility and effectiveness of a personalized exercise program during cancer treatment: results from the CHOiCE prospective study.The oncologist · 2026Trial
- Exercise-induced extracellular vesicles mediate apoptosis in human colon cancer cells in an exercise intensity-dependent manner.European journal of applied physiology · 2025Trial
- Exercise training to increase tumour natural killer-cell infiltration in men with localised prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial.BJU international · 2023Trial
- Aerobic exercise induces tumor suppressor p16Aging · 2020Trial
- Exercise therapy in cancer prevention and treatment.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Total moderate-to-vigorous physical activity across the adult life course and the risk of invasive ovarian cancer.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Long-term association of physical activity with survival by primary cancer treatment in endometrial cancer: The Alberta Endometrial Cancer Cohort Study.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Exercise reduces hepatic pre-metastatic niche formation via TREM-1 signaling in kupffer cells.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Sarcopenia promotes tumorigenesis by disrupting NOTCH-SDC2-regulated biogenesis of muscle-derived extracellular vesicles.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Exercise and CD8Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Kinetic Human Movement Ontology: a semantic terminology model to symbolically represent physiological movement.Scientific data · 2026Article
- AB-Flu nanodrug combined with exercise intervention enhances ROS-mediated antitumor effects in melanoma.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A major objective of the emerging field of exercise-oncology research is to determine the efficacy of, and biological mechanisms by which, aerobic exercise affects cancer incidence, progression, and/or metastasis. There is a strong inverse association between self-reported exercise and the primary incidence of several forms of cancer; similarly, emerging data suggest that exercise exposure after a cancer diagnosis may improve outcomes for early-stage breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer. Arguably, critical next steps in the development of exercise as a candidate treatment in cancer control require preclinical studies to validate the biological efficacy of exercise, identify the optimal "dose", and pinpoint mechanisms of action. To evaluate the current evidence base, we conducted a critical systematic review of in vivo studies investigating the effects of exercise in cancer prevention and progression. Studies were evaluated on the basis of tumor outcomes (e.g., incidence, growth, latency, metastasis), dose-response, and mechanisms of action, when available. A total of 53 studies were identified and evaluated on tumor incidence (n = 24), tumor growth (n = 33), or metastasis (n = 10). We report that the current evidence base is plagued by considerable methodologic heterogeneity in all aspects of study design, endpoints, and efficacy. Such heterogeneity precludes meaningful comparisons and conclusions at present. To this end, we provide a framework of methodologic and data reporting standards to strengthen the field to guide the conduct of high-quality studies required to inform translational, mechanism-driven clinical trials. Cancer Res; 76(14); 4032-50. ©2016 AACR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.