Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27381189›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2016

Gone for good? An online survey of emigrant health professionals using Facebook as a recruitment tool.

Sara McAleese, Barbara Clyne, Anne Matthews, Ruairí Brugha, Niamh Humphries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Doctor Retention: A Cross-sectional Study of How Ireland Has Been Losing the Battle.International journal of health policy and management · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara McAleeseDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland. mcaleese.sara@gmail.com.
Barbara ClyneDepartment of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.
Anne MatthewsSchool of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Ruairí BrughaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.
Niamh HumphriesDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth professionals, particularly doctors, nurses and midwives, are in high demand worldwide. Therefore, it is important to assess the future plans and likelihood of return of emigrating health professionals. Nevertheless, health professionals are, by definition, a difficult population to track/survey. This exploratory study reports on the migration intentions of a sample of doctors, nurses and midwives who had emigrated from Ireland, a high-income country which has experienced particularly high outward and inward migration of health professionals since the year 2000.

methodsHealth professionals who had emigrated from Ireland were identified via snowball sampling through Facebook and invited to complete a short online survey composed of closed and open response questions.

resultsA total of 388 health professionals (307 doctors, 73 nurses and 8 midwives) who had previously worked in Ireland completed the survey. While over half had originally intended to spend less than 5 years in their destination country at the time of emigration, these intentions changed over time, with the desire to remain abroad on a permanent basis increasing from 10 to 34 % of doctor respondents. Only a quarter of doctors and a half of nurses and midwives intended to return to practice in Ireland in the future.

conclusionsThe longer health professionals remain abroad, the less likely they are to return to their home countries. Countries should focus on the implementation of retention strategies if the 'carousel' of brain drain is to be interrupted. This would allow source countries to benefit from their investments in training health professionals, rather than relying on international recruitment to meet health system staffing needs. Improved data collection systems are also needed to track the migratory patterns and changing intentions of health professionals. Meanwhile, social networking platforms offer alternative methods of filling this information gap.

Indexed as

Emigration and ImmigrationIntentionNursesPersonnel SelectionPhysiciansProfessional Practice LocationSocial MediaAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelDelivery of Health CareEmigrants and ImmigrantsForeign Professional PersonnelHumansIrelandNurse MidwivesSurveys and QuestionnairesDoctorsEmigrationHealth workforce planningMidwivesNursesOnline survey

Identifiers

PMID27381189
PMCPMC4943487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.