ArticleHuman resources for health2016
The views of migrant health workers living in Austria and Belgium on return migration to sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in Human resources for health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- `This is our country and somehow, we have to make it work': a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study of the enablers of non-migration and return migration in a cohort of Nigerian medical doctors and dentists.Global health action · 2026Article
- International migration of Africa-born health workers: a scoping review of drivers and policies, 2010-2024.Human resources for health · 2026Article
- Gender equity in neurosurgery requires structural reform.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- The scientific African diaspora in the Nordic region: policy perspectives on strengthening Africa-Nordic technology collaboration.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- The return of Chinese nurses from overseas (2009-2023): a mixed-method study on influencing factors.Globalization and health · 2025Article
- Dynamics and factors influencing return migration to Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Diaspora engagement: a scoping review of diaspora involvement with strengthening health systems of their origin country.Global health action · 2022Article
- Experiences of Healthcare Worker Returnees in Their Home Countries: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2021Article
- 'I don't want to have a separated home': Reckoning family and return migration among married Nigerians in China.Migration studies · 2020Article
- Home is home-Botswana's return migrant health workers.PloS one · 2018Article
- Against Cursory Treatments in Ethics of Medical Migration from Underserved Countries.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2017Article
- The WHO Global Code: increasing relevance and effectiveness.Human resources for health · 2016Article
- The Role of African Nurse Diaspora in Addressing Public Health Priorities in Africa.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe negative consequences of the brain drain of sub-Saharan African health workers for source countries are well documented and include understaffed facilities, decreased standards of care and higher workloads. However, studies suggest that, if migrated health workers eventually return to their home countries, this may lead to beneficial effects following the transfer of their acquired skills and knowledge (brain gain). The present study aims to explore the factors influencing the intentions for return migration of sub-Saharan African health workers who emigrated to Austria and Belgium, and gain further insight into the potential of circular migration.
methodsSemi-structured interviews with 27 sub-Saharan African health workers in Belgium and Austria were conducted.
resultsAs mentioned by the respondents, the main barriers for returning were family, structural crises in the source country, and insecurity. These barriers overrule the perceived drivers, which were nearly all pull factors and emotion driven. Despite the fact that only a minority plans to return permanently, many wish to return regularly to work in the healthcare sector or to contribute to the development of their source country.
conclusionAs long as safety and structural stability cannot be guaranteed in source countries, the number of return migrants is likely to remain low. National governments and regional organizations could play a role in facilitating the engagement of migrant health workers in the development of the healthcare system in source countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.