Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27380628›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2016

Regulation of distinct branches of the non-canonical Wnt-signaling network in Xenopus dorsal marginal zone explants.

Veronika Wallkamm, Karolin Rahm, Jana Schmoll, Lilian T Kaufmann, Eva Brinkmann, Jessica Schunk, Bianca Kraft, Doris Wedlich, Dietmar Gradl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Veronika WallkammZoological Institute, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Karolin RahmZoological Institute, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Jana SchmollZoological Institute, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Lilian T KaufmannSection Developmental Genetics, Institute for Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eva BrinkmannSection Developmental Genetics, Institute for Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jessica SchunkZoological Institute, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Bianca KraftClinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Hematology/Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Department of Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Doris WedlichZoological Institute, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Dietmar GradlZoological Institute, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany. dietmar.gradl@kit.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6216-018X
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology · DEHeidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA tight regulation of the Wnt-signaling network, activated by 19 Wnt molecules and numerous receptors and co-receptors, is required for the establishment of a complex organism. Different branches of this Wnt-signaling network, including the canonical Wnt/β-catenin and the non-canonical Wnt/PCP, Wnt/Ror2 and Wnt/Ca(2+) pathways, are assigned to distinct developmental processes and are triggered by certain ligand/receptor complexes. The Wnt-signaling molecules are closely related and it is still on debate whether the information for activating a specific branch is encoded by specific sequence motifs within a particular Wnt protein. The model organism Xenopus offers tools to distinguish between Wnt-signaling molecules activating distinct branches of the network.

resultsWe created chimeric Wnt8a/Wnt11 molecules and could demonstrate that the C-terminal part (containing the BS2) of Wnt8a is responsible for secondary axis formation. Chimeric Wnt11/Wnt5a molecules revealed that the N-terminus with the elements PS3-1 and PS3-2 defines Wnt11 specificity, while elements PS3-1, PS3-2 and PS3-3 are required for Wnt5a specificity. Furthermore, we used Xenopus dorsal marginal zone explants to identify non-canonical Wnt target genes regulated by the Wnt5a branch and the Wnt11 branch. We found that pbk was specifically regulated by Wnt5a and rab11fip5 by Wnt11. Overexpression of these target genes phenocopied the overexpression of their regulators, confirming the distinct roles of Wnt11 and Wnt5a triggered signaling pathways. Furthermore, knock-down of pbk was able to restore convergent extension movements in Wnt5a morphants.

conclusionsThe N-terminal part of non-canonical Wnt proteins decides whether the Wnt5a or the Wnt11 branch of the Wnt-signaling network gets activated. The different non-canonical Wnt branches not only regulate cellular behavior, but, surprisingly, also regulate the expression of different target genes. One of these target genes, pbk, seems to be the relevant target gene executing Wnt5a-mediated regulation of convergent extension movements.

Indexed as

Body PatterningWnt Signaling PathwayAnimalsEpistasis, GeneticRecombinant ProteinsXenopusXenopus ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsXenopus ProteinsConvergent extension movementsNon-canonical Wnt-signalingWnt-signaling network

Identifiers

PMID27380628
PMCPMC4932719
OpenAlexW2470816227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.