Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27380195›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2016

Software-based PET-MR image coregistration: combined PET-MRI for the rest of us!

Matthew S Robertson, Xinyang Liu, William Plishker, George F Zaki, Pranav K Vyas, Nabile M Safdar, Raj Shekhar

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. PET/CT Fluoroscopy during PET/CT-Guided Interventions: Initial Experience.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew S RobertsonSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Health System, 111 Michigan Ave. NW, Washington, DC, 20010, USA.
Xinyang LiuSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Health System, 111 Michigan Ave. NW, Washington, DC, 20010, USA.
William PlishkerIGI Technologies, Inc., College Park, MD, USA.
George F ZakiIGI Technologies, Inc., College Park, MD, USA.
Pranav K VyasSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Health System, 111 Michigan Ave. NW, Washington, DC, 20010, USA.
Nabile M SafdarSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Health System, 111 Michigan Ave. NW, Washington, DC, 20010, USA.
Raj ShekharSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Health System, 111 Michigan Ave. NW, Washington, DC, 20010, USA. rshekhar@childrensnational.org.

Funding

Development of a low-cost hardware accelerator for 3D image registrationR42CA137886 · NCI · IGI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · PI SHEKHAR, RAJ · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R42 CA137886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the introduction of hybrid positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI), a new imaging option to acquire multimodality images with complementary anatomical and functional information has become available. Compared with hybrid PET/computed tomography (CT), hybrid PET/MRI is capable of providing superior anatomical detail while removing the radiation exposure associated with CT. The early adoption of hybrid PET/MRI, however, has been limited.

objectiveTo provide a viable alternative to the hybrid PET/MRI hardware by validating a software-based solution for PET-MR image coregistration. MATERIALS AND

methodsA fully automated, graphics processing unit-accelerated 3-D deformable image registration technique was used to align PET (acquired as PET/CT) and MR image pairs of 17 patients (age range: 10 months-21 years, mean: 10 years) who underwent PET/CT and body MRI (chest, abdomen or pelvis), which were performed within a 28-day (mean: 10.5 days) interval. MRI data for most of these cases included single-station post-contrast axial T1-weighted images. Following registration, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) values observed in coregistered PET (cPET) and the original PET were compared for 82 volumes of interest. In addition, we calculated the target registration error as a measure of the quality of image coregistration, and evaluated the algorithm's performance in the context of interexpert variability.

resultsThe coregistration execution time averaged 97±45 s. The overall relative SUVmax difference was 7% between cPET-MRI and PET/CT. The average target registration error was 10.7±6.6 mm, which compared favorably with the typical voxel size (diagonal distance) of 8.0 mm (typical resolution: 0.66 mm × 0.66 mm × 8 mm) for MRI and 6.1 mm (typical resolution: 3.65 mm × 3.65 mm × 3.27 mm) for PET. The variability in landmark identification did not show statistically significant differences between the algorithm and a typical expert.

conclusionWe have presented a software-based solution that achieves the many benefits of hybrid PET/MRI scanners without actually needing one. The method proved to be accurate and potentially clinically useful.

Indexed as

Multimodal ImagingSoftwareAdolescentAlgorithmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePositron-Emission TomographyRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultChildrenDeformable image registrationImage coregistrationImage fusionPositron emission tomographyPositron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID27380195
PMCPMC5039099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.