ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2016
Analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients to differentiate between malignant transformation of endometrioma and endometrioma.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cholesterol granuloma forming the solid components within an endometrioma showing intense FDG uptake, mimicking malignancy: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOf those patients who undergo open surgery for a suspicion of malignant transformation of endometrioma (MTOE) due to solid nodule enhancement identified by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), some benign endometrioma cases are included. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the value and diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) to differentiate between MTOE and endometrioma. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1599 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for the diagnosis of endometrioma preoperatively and 31 patients who underwent open surgery for a suspicion of MTOE preoperatively from January 2003 to December 2011. We analyzed the age, serum CA125 levels, and MRI findings of the patients and calculated the optimal cut-off value for PET/CT using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
resultsOf the 1,599 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for a suspicion of endometrioma preoperatively, malignancy was identified in one (0.062 %) patient. Of the 31 patients who underwent open surgery for a suspicion of MTOE preoperatively, 11 were diagnosed with endometrioma (false positive group) and 20 with MTOE stage I (positive group). Age, tumor size, presence of shading on MRI and maximum standardized uptake values (SUV
conclusionPET/CT is a good diagnostic tool for MTOE using the optimal SUV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.