Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27380057›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2016

GPC-HCC model: a combination of glybican-3 with other routine parameters improves the diagnostic efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Abdelfattah M Attallah, Mohamed El-Far, Mohamed M Omran, Mohamed A Abdelrazek, Ahmed A Attallah, Aya M Saeed, Khaled Farid

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abdelfattah M AttallahBiotechnology Research Center, P.O. Box (14), 23 July St., Industrial Zone, New Damietta, 34517, Egypt. amattallah@hotmail.com.
Mohamed El-FarFaculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohamed M OmranFaculty of Science, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed A AbdelrazekBiotechnology Research Center, P.O. Box (14), 23 July St., Industrial Zone, New Damietta, 34517, Egypt.
Ahmed A AttallahBiotechnology Research Center, P.O. Box (14), 23 July St., Industrial Zone, New Damietta, 34517, Egypt.
Aya M SaeedBiotechnology Research Center, P.O. Box (14), 23 July St., Industrial Zone, New Damietta, 34517, Egypt.
Khaled FaridFaculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mansoura University · EGHelwan University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflicting results for circulating glypican-3 (GPC3) were reported in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis. We aimed to improve the diagnostic power of GPC3 by developing a GPC-HCC model for diagnosing HCC. GPC3 was tested for HCC (138), liver cirrhosis (56), and fibrosis (62) patients by ELISA. Data from patient groups were retrospectively analyzed. A novel score, GPC-HCC, based on combination of GPC3 and routine laboratory tests, was developed for HCC diagnosis. The GPC-HCC model values produced a significant 1.7-fold increase in liver cirrhosis and 3.2-fold increase in HCC, in comparison with liver fibrosis. In contrast to GPC3 and alpha fetoprotein (AFP), the GPC-HCC model showed high HCC diagnostic power with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.939, sensitivity 93 %, specificity 93 %, positive predictive value 89 %, negative predictive value 95 %, and efficiency 93 %. GPC-HCC AUC in HCC with single tumor, absent vascular invasion, and tumor size ≤3 cm were 0.93, 0.92, and 0.92, respectively, compared with 0.63, 0.63, and 0.64, respectively, for GPC3 and 0.69, 0.70, 0.55, respectively, for AFP. In conclusion, owing to these promising findings, the combination of GPC3 with other laboratory simple routine tests (GPC-HCC model) could improve the diagnostic power of GPC3 in HCC screening and follow up of cirrhotic patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedalpha-FetoproteinsBilirubinBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularGlypicansHumansLiver NeoplasmsMiddle Agedalpha-FetoproteinsBilirubinBiomarkers, TumorGlypicansGPC3 protein, humanBiomarkersDiagnosisGlypican-3Hepatocellular carcinomaSerumα-fetoprotein

Identifiers

PMID27380057
OpenAlexW2470473106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.