ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2016
Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04178473 (Total Versus Subtotal Abdominal Hysterectomy at Time of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Total Versus Subtotal Abdominal Hysterectomy at Time of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Effect of Growth Factors on Vaginal Wound Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Percutaneous laparoscopic harvest and trans-vaginal implantation of autologous rectus fascia in the treatment of severe anterior vaginal prolapse.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Is Transvaginal Minimally Invasive Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation a Safe and Effective Surgical Approach for Treating Recurrent Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Quality of Life Assessment After Pelvic Prolapse Surgery With and Without Mesh: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Epidural Anesthesia and Pelvic Floor Outcomes in Primiparas: A Retrospective Transperineal Ultrasound Study.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic analysis revealsZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024Article
- Identification of potential molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Clinical risk factors for recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after primary native tissue prolapse repair.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2022Article
- Outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy for pelvic organ prolapse: a single center retrospective study.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2022Article
- Preoperative ultrasound findings as risk factors of recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- LeFort colpocleisis for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
- Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?Current urology reports · 2017Review
- Turkish adaptation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score and its validity and reliability.International urogynecology journal · 2017Article
- Biomechanical paradigm and interpretation of female pelvic floor conditions before a treatment.International journal of women's health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThis committee opinion paper summarizes available evidence about recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) to provide guidance on management.
methodA working subcommittee from the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) Research and Development Committee was formed. The literature regarding recurrent POP was reviewed and summarized by individual members of the subcommittee. Recommendations were graded according to the 2009 Oxford Levels of Evidence. The summary was reviewed by the Committee.
resultsThere is no agreed definition for recurrent POP and evidence in relation to its evaluation and management is limited.
conclusionThe assessment of recurrent POP should entail looking for possible reason(s) for failure, including persistent and/or new risk factors, detection of all pelvic floor defects and checking for complications of previous surgery. The management requires individual evaluation of the risks and benefits of different options and appropriate patient counseling. There is an urgent need for an agreed definition and further research into all aspects of recurrent POP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27379891What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.