Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27379732›Full record

ArticleCancer2016

Association of functional status and treatment choice among older men with prostate cancer in the Medicare Advantage population.

Bruce L Jacobs, Samia H Lopa, Jonathan G Yabes, Joel B Nelson, Amber E Barnato, Howard B Degenholtz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact of comorbidities at diagnosis on prostate cancer treatment and survival.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bruce L JacobsDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. jacobsbl2@upmc.edu.
Samia H LopaDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jonathan G YabesCenter for Research on Health Care, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Joel B NelsonDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Amber E BarnatoCenter for Research on Health Care, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Howard B DegenholtzDepartment of Health Policy Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · USDepartment of Health · TWUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE: BPCAUL1RR024153 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2006 to 2011
$73.9M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstitutionKL2TR000146 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$8.7M
Enriching Claims-Based Analysis of Prostate Cancer Treatment Decision MakingR03AG048091 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JACOBS, BRUCE L. · 2014 to 2015
$228k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000146NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024153NIA NIH HHS R03 AG048091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are several effective treatments for prostate cancer. To what extent a patient's functional status influences the treatment decision is unknown. This study examined the association between functional status and treatment among older men with prostate cancer.

methodsSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey data were used to identify men who were 65 years old or older and were diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1998 and 2009. The primary outcome was treatment choice: conservative management, surgery, or radiation within 1 year of the diagnosis. The exposure was the functional status assessed as 4 measures within 3 domains: 1) physical function (activities of daily living [ADLs] and physical component summary score), 2) cognitive function (survey completer: self vs proxy), and 3) emotional well-being (mental component summary score). A multivariate, multinomial logistic regression was fitted with adjustments for several patient, tumor, and regional characteristics.

resultsThis study identified 508 conservative management patients, 195 surgery patients, and 603 radiation patients. Compared with men with no ADL dependency, those with any ADL dependency had lower odds of receiving surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.99) or radiation (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43-0.78) versus conservative management. ADL dependency did not differ when surgery and radiation were compared. Patients with a proxy survey response were less likely to receive surgery or radiation versus conservative management.

conclusionsFunctional status is associated with treatment choice for men with prostate cancer. Future research should examine whether this is due to physician recommendations, patient preferences, or a combination. Cancer 2016;122:3199-206. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingChoice BehaviorPatient PreferenceAgedFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMedicare Part CNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsSEER ProgramUnited StatesWatchful Waitingactivities of daily livingconservative managementfunctional statusprostate cancerradiationsurgery

Identifiers

PMID27379732
PMCPMC5048507
OpenAlexW2475081288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.