Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27379625›Full record

Trial reportInternational urology and nephrology2016

Comparison of high-flux hemodialysis with hemodialysis filtration in treatment of uraemic pruritus: a randomized controlled trial.

Xia Jiang, Fen Ji, Zhi-Wei Chen, Qiao-Lin Huang

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urology and nephrology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions for itch in people with advanced chronic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis-a Consensus Statement from the EuDial Working Group of the ERA.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Uremic Pruritus: From Diagnosis to Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xia JiangDepartment of Nephrology, Center of Blood Purification, The Second People's Hospital of Nantong, 43 Xinglong Road, TangZha, Nantong, 226002, Jiangsu, China.
Fen JiDepartment of Nephrology, Center of Blood Purification, The Second People's Hospital of Nantong, 43 Xinglong Road, TangZha, Nantong, 226002, Jiangsu, China.
Zhi-Wei ChenDepartment of Nephrology, Center of Blood Purification, The Second People's Hospital of Nantong, 43 Xinglong Road, TangZha, Nantong, 226002, Jiangsu, China.
Qiao-Lin HuangDepartment of Nephrology, Center of Blood Purification, The Second People's Hospital of Nantong, 43 Xinglong Road, TangZha, Nantong, 226002, Jiangsu, China. qiaolinhuangnt@sina.com.
Nantong University · CNSecond People's Hospital of NanTong · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUraemic pruritus (UP) is one of the most common complications in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis and greatly undermines their quality of life. The present study was designed to compare the clinical effect of high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD) with hemodialysis filtration (HDF) in the treatment of UP in ESRD patients, and to explore the possible underlying mechanisms. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this 12-week randomized and controlled trial, the clinical efficacy of HFHD or HDF on UP patients undergoing dialysis was evaluated. A total of 51 uremia patients suffering from pruritus from January 2009 to May 2013 were recruited and randomly assigned to intervention (n = 27) and control (n = 24) groups. The control group was received only HDF therapy, and the intervention group underwent HFHD treatment three times a week for 12 weeks.

resultsThe scores for Visual Analogue Scale in both two groups were obviously decreased, but the Visual Analogue Scale scores in the intervention group had a better improvement than the control group within 12 weeks. The PSQI and SF-12 values in the intervention group had a better improvement than the control group within 12 weeks. In comparison of the changes from baseline between the control groups, there was greater improvement in BUN, creatinine, calcium, phosphorus, PTH, β2-MG, histamine, CRP and IL-6 levels of intervention group.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that HFHD has a better efficacy in the treatment of UP than HDF. HFHD has an exactly therapeutical efficacy in the UP associated with the inhibition of microinflammation state in dialysis patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHemodiafiltrationHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPruritusQuality of LifeRenal DialysisSeverity of Illness IndexSleepUremiaVisual Analog ScaleEnd-stage renal diseaseHemodialysisInflammationPruritusUremia

Identifiers

PMID27379625
OpenAlexW2463020303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.