ArticleJournal of anesthesia2016
Impact of aspirin use on morbidity and mortality in massively transfused cardiac surgery patients: a propensity score matched cohort study.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of massive blood product requirement in cardiac surgery: A large retrospective study from 2 heart centers.Medicine · 2019Observational
- Perioperative management and monitoring of antiplatelet agents: a focused review on aspirin and P2YKorean journal of anesthesiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAspirin may prevent organ dysfunction in critically ill patients and mitigate transfusion associated acute lung injury. We hypothesized that aspirin use might be associated with decreased morbidity and mortality in massively transfused cardiac surgery patients.
methodsA single center retrospective cohort study was performed using data from an 8.5-year period (2006-2014). Massive transfusion was defined as receiving at least 2400 ml (8 units) of red blood cell units intraoperatively. A propensity score model was created to account for the likelihood of receiving aspirin and matched pairs were identified using global optimal matching. The primary endpoint, in-hospital mortality, was compared between aspirin users and non-users. Secondary outcomes including: ICU hours, mechanical lung ventilation hours, prolonged mechanical lung ventilation (>24 h), pneumonia, stroke, acute renal failure, atrial fibrillation, deep sternal wound infection, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome were also compared.
resultsOf 7492 cardiac surgery patients, 452 (6 %) were massively transfused and mortality was 30.6 %. There were 346 patients included in the matched cohort. No significant association was found between preoperative aspirin use and in-hospital mortality; absolute risk reduction with aspirin = 7.5 % (95 % CI -2.0 to 16.9 %, p = 0.12). Preoperative aspirin use was associated with fewer total mechanical lung ventilation hours (p = 0.02) and less prolonged mechanical lung ventilation; absolute risk reduction = 11.0 % (95 % CI 1.1-20.5 %, p = 0.02).
conclusionsPreoperative aspirin use is not associated with decreased in-hospital mortality in massively transfused cardiac surgery patients, but may be associated with less mechanical lung ventilation time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.