Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27379210›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2016

Appendiceal Mixed Adeno-Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry.

Shayna Brathwaite, Martha M Yearsley, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Lai Wei, Carl R Schmidt, Mary E Dillhoff, Wendy L Frankel, John L Hays, Christina Wu, Sherif Abdel-Misih

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shayna BrathwaiteDepartment of General Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH , USA.
Martha M YearsleyDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH , USA.
Tanios Bekaii-SaabDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH , USA.
Lai WeiCenter for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH , USA.
Carl R SchmidtDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH , USA.
Mary E DillhoffDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH , USA.
Wendy L FrankelDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH , USA.
John L HaysDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH , USA.
Christina WuDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH , USA.
Sherif Abdel-MisihDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) is a rare pathological diagnosis recently defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2010. Prior to the definition by the WHO, tumors with both adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine components were given multiple pathological designations making it difficult to characterize the disease. The aim of our study is to better characterize MANEC to better understand its natural history to influence patient care and positively impact outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program database was queried for all patients aged 18 years or older between 1973 and 2012 who had the diagnosis composite carcinoid (n = 249) of the appendix. Composite carcinoid tumors refer to tumors that have both adenocarcinoma and carcinoid tumor components present, consistent with that pathological diagnosis MANEC. For comparison, the database was also queried for carcinoid tumor of the appendix (n = 950), signet ring cell carcinoma of the appendix (n = 579), and goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) tumors of the appendix (n = 944). The data were retrospectively reviewed, and clinicopathological characteristics, treatment regimens, and survival data were obtained.

resultsThe median age of diagnosis of MANEC tumors was 58 years of age. Eighty percent of patients were White, and 49% were female. Fifty-four percent of patients underwent hemicolectomy and 31% had partial/subtotal colectomy as their surgical management. Median overall survival for MANEC was 6.5 years (95% CI 4.5-9.7), which was statistically significantly shorter (p < 0.0001) in comparison to 13.8 years (95% CI 12.1-16.5) for GCC, 2.1 years (95% CI 1.8-2.3) for signet ring cell carcinoma, and 39.4 years (95% CI 37.1-NA) for carcinoid tumors. DISCUSSION: MANEC is a more aggressive clinical entity than both GCC of the appendix and carcinoid tumors of the appendix. Based on these findings, patients with MANEC tumors should undergo aggressive multidisciplinary cancer management.

Indexed as

appendiceal neoplasmcolonic neoplasmsmixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinomaSEER

Identifiers

PMID27379210
PMCPMC4904130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.