Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27379128›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

Mixed Nodule Infection in Sinorhizobium meliloti-Medicago sativa Symbiosis Suggest the Presence of Cheating Behavior.

Alice Checcucci, Elisa Azzarello, Marco Bazzicalupo, Marco Galardini, Alessandra Lagomarsino, Stefano Mancuso, Lucia Marti, Maria C Marzano, Stefano Mocali, Andrea Squartini and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Heliyon · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alice CheccucciDepartment of Biology, University of Florence Florence, Italy.
Elisa AzzarelloDepartment of Agri-Food Production and Environmental Science, University of Florence Florence, Italy.
Marco BazzicalupoDepartment of Biology, University of Florence Florence, Italy.
Marco GalardiniEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory - European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Cambridge, UK.
Alessandra LagomarsinoConsiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l'Analisi dell'Economia Agraria, Centro di Ricerca per l'Agrobiologia e la Pedologia Florence, Italy.
Stefano MancusoDepartment of Agri-Food Production and Environmental Science, University of Florence Florence, Italy.
Lucia MartiDepartment of Agri-Food Production and Environmental Science, University of Florence Florence, Italy.
Maria C MarzanoDepartment of Agri-Food Production and Environmental Science, University of Florence Florence, Italy.
Stefano MocaliConsiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l'Analisi dell'Economia Agraria, Centro di Ricerca per l'Agrobiologia e la Pedologia Florence, Italy.
Andrea SquartiniDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and the Environment, University of Padua Padova, Italy.
Marina ZanardoDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and the Environment, University of Padua Padova, Italy.
Alessio MengoniDepartment of Biology, University of Florence Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITConsiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria · ITUniversity of Padua · ITWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the symbiosis between rhizobia and legumes, host plants can form symbiotic root nodules with multiple rhizobial strains, potentially showing different symbiotic performances in nitrogen fixation. Here, we investigated the presence of mixed nodules, containing rhizobia with different degrees of mutualisms, and evaluate their relative fitness in the Sinorhizobium meliloti-Medicago sativa model symbiosis. We used three S. meliloti strains, the mutualist strains Rm1021 and BL225C and the non-mutualist AK83. We performed competition experiments involving both in vitro and in vivo symbiotic assays with M. sativa host plants. We show the occurrence of a high number (from 27 to 100%) of mixed nodules with no negative effect on both nitrogen fixation and plant growth. The estimation of the relative fitness as non-mutualist/mutualist ratios in single nodules shows that in some nodules the non-mutualist strain efficiently colonized root nodules along with the mutualist ones. In conclusion, we can support the hypothesis that in S. meliloti-M. sativa symbiosis mixed nodules are formed and allow non-mutualist or less-mutualist bacterial partners to be less or not sanctioned by the host plant, hence allowing a potential form of cheating behavior to be present in the nitrogen fixing symbiosis.

Indexed as

cheatingcompetitionMedicago sativamixed nodulesSinorhizobium melilotisymbiotic nitrogen fixation

Identifiers

PMID27379128
PMCPMC4904023
OpenAlexW2409711775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.