Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27378993›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2016

Blind-Sight vs. Degraded-Sight: Different Measures Tell a Different Story.

Chiara Mazzi, Chiara Bagattini, Silvia Savazzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reappraising intuitions about consciousness.Frontiers in psychology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Voxel-Based Lesion-Symptom Mapping Localizes Residual Visual Function in Hemianopia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Ultrahigh Field fMRI Reveals Different Roles of the Temporal and Frontoparietal Cortices in Subjective Awareness.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Functional blindsight and its diagnosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Continuous flash suppression: Known and unknowns.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2020
    Review
  13. Information Closure Theory of Consciousness.Frontiers in psychology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Fata Morgana of Unconscious Perception.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chiara MazziUniversity of Verona and National Institute of NeuroscienceVerona, Italy; Perception and Awareness (PandA) Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of VeronaVerona, Italy.
Chiara BagattiniCognitive Neuroscience Section, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli Brescia, Italy.
Silvia SavazziUniversity of Verona and National Institute of NeuroscienceVerona, Italy; Perception and Awareness (PandA) Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of VeronaVerona, Italy.

Funding

European Research Council 339939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blindsight patients can detect, localize, and discriminate visual stimuli in their blind field, despite denying being able to see the stimuli. However, the literature documents the cases of blindsight patients who demonstrated a preserved degree of awareness in their impaired visual field. The aim of this study is to investigate the nature of visual processing within the impaired visual field and to ask whether it reflects pure unconscious behavior or conscious, yet degraded, vision. A hemianopic patient (SL) with a complete lesion to the left primary visual cortex was tested. SL was asked to discriminate several stimulus features (orientation, color, contrast, and motion) presented in her impaired visual field in a two-alternative forced-choice task. SL had to report her subjective experience: in the first experiment as "seen" or "guessed," whereas in the second experiment as the degree of clarity of her experience according to the perceptual awareness scale. In the first experiment, SL demonstrated a performance above-chance in the discrimination task for "guessed" trials, thus showing type 1 blindsight. In the second experiment, however, SL showed above-chance performance only when she reported a certain degree of awareness, thus showing that SL's preserved discrimination ability relies on conscious vision. These data show that graded measures to assess awareness, which can better tap on the complexity of conscious experience, need to be used in order to differentiate genuine forms of blindsight from degraded conscious vision.

Indexed as

blindsightdegraded visionperceptual awareness scaleprimary visual cortexvisual awareness

Identifiers

PMID27378993
PMCPMC4909743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.