Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27378955›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2016

Can Bayesian Theories of Autism Spectrum Disorder Help Improve Clinical Practice?

Helene Haker, Maya Schneebeli, Klaas Enno Stephan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mismatch Negativity in Autism: Insights Into Predictive Mechanisms.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Prediction in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How mood shapes belief updating bias in depression.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Disentangling the perceptual underpinnings of autism: Evidence from a face aftereffects experiment.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Closed-loop fMRI at the mesoscopic scale of columns and layers: Can we do it and why would we want to?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Helene HakerTranslational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich , Zurich , Switzerland.
Maya SchneebeliTranslational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich , Zurich , Switzerland.
Klaas Enno StephanTranslational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK; Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne, Germany.
University of Zurich · CHMax Planck Institute for Metabolism Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis and individualized treatment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) represent major problems for contemporary psychiatry. Tackling these problems requires guidance by a pathophysiological theory. In this paper, we consider recent theories that re-conceptualize ASD from a "Bayesian brain" perspective, which posit that the core abnormality of ASD resides in perceptual aberrations due to a disbalance in the precision of prediction errors (sensory noise) relative to the precision of predictions (prior beliefs). This results in percepts that are dominated by sensory inputs and less guided by top-down regularization and shifts the perceptual focus to detailed aspects of the environment with difficulties in extracting meaning. While these Bayesian theories have inspired ongoing empirical studies, their clinical implications have not yet been carved out. Here, we consider how this Bayesian perspective on disease mechanisms in ASD might contribute to improving clinical care for affected individuals. Specifically, we describe a computational strategy, based on generative (e.g., hierarchical Bayesian) models of behavioral and functional neuroimaging data, for establishing diagnostic tests. These tests could provide estimates of specific cognitive processes underlying ASD and delineate pathophysiological mechanisms with concrete treatment targets. Written with a clinical audience in mind, this article outlines how the development of computational diagnostics applicable to behavioral and functional neuroimaging data in routine clinical practice could not only fundamentally alter our concept of ASD but eventually also transform the clinical management of this disorder.

Indexed as

Asperger syndromeautism spectrum disorderBayesian inferenceBayesian modelsdiagnostic testsgenerative modelingneuroimagingtranslational research

Identifiers

PMID27378955
PMCPMC4911361
OpenAlexW2423299422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.