Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27378949›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2016

Updates and Current Perspectives of Psychiatric Assessments after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

Ana Luiza Zaninotto, Jessica Elias Vicentini, Felipe Fregni, Priscila Aparecida Rodrigues, Cibele Botelho, Mara Cristina Souza de Lucia, Wellingson Silva Paiva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Human Brain Injury and miRNAs: An Experimental Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana Luiza ZaninottoLaboratory of Neuromodulation, Center for Clinical Research Learning, Harvard Medical School (HMS), Charlestown, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University São Paulo (USP-SP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Jessica Elias VicentiniDepartment of Neurology, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP) , Campinas , Brazil.
Felipe FregniLaboratory of Neuromodulation, Center for Clinical Research Learning, Harvard Medical School (HMS) , Charlestown, MA , USA.
Priscila Aparecida RodriguesDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University São Paulo (USP-SP) , São Paulo , Brazil.
Cibele BotelhoDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University São Paulo (USP-SP) , São Paulo , Brazil.
Mara Cristina Souza de LuciaDivision of Psychology, School of Medicine, University São Paulo (USP-SP) , São Paulo , Brazil.
Wellingson Silva PaivaDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University São Paulo (USP-SP) , São Paulo , Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropsychological and psychiatric disorders represent a major concern and cause of disabilities after the trauma, contributing to worse recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the lack of well-defined parameters to evaluate patient's psychiatric disorders leads to a wide range of diagnoses and symptoms. The aim of this study was to perform a review of literature in order to gather data of the most common scales and inventories used to assess and diagnose depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after TBI. We conducted a literature search via MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science. We included reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analysis studies, and we used the following keywords: "traumatic brain injury OR TBI," "depression OR depressive disorder," "anxiety," and "posttraumatic stress disorder OR PTSD." From 610 titles, a total of 68 systematic reviews or meta-analysis were included in the section "Results" of this review: depression (n = 32), anxiety (n = 9), and PTSD (n = 27). Depression after TBI is a more established condition, with more homogeneous studies. Anxiety and PTSD disorders have been studied in a heterogeneous way, usually as comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders. Some scales and inventories designed for the general community may not be appropriate for patients with TBI.

Indexed as

anxietyassessmentdepressioninventory reportingposttraumatic stress disorderpsychiatryquestionnairesscalestraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID27378949
PMCPMC4906018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.