ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2016
Basophil Reactivity as Biomarker in Immediate Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions-Potential and Limitations.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reframing ATR: from the immunologic/nonimmunologic dichotomy to adaptive, innate, and physicochemical drivers within the allergy-inflammation-coagulation axis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Clinical phenotypes, endotypes, and biomarker profiles of immediate rituximab hypersensitivity reactions: a prospective pharmacovigilance study.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Use of CCR3, CD63, CD203c and FcεRIα on Blood Leukocytes of Allergic Asthma and Combined Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Syndrome.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- The Role of the Basophil Activation Test in the Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Exponential magnetophoretic gradient for the direct isolation of basophils from whole blood in a microfluidic system.Lab on a chip · 2022Article
- Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Second dose of COVID-19 vaccination in immediate reactions to the first BNT162b2.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2022Article
- Nanoarchitectures for efficient IgE cross-linking on effector cells to study amoxicillin allergy.Allergy · 2021Article
- Methylprednisolone-induced anaphylaxis diagnosed by intradermal skin test: a case report.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021Article
- Clinical value ofAsia Pacific allergy · 2020Review
- Hypersensitivity Reactions to Multiple Iodinated Contrast Media.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- The utility of the basophil activation test in the diagnosis of immediate amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate hypersensitivity in children and adults.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2017Article
- The Evolution of Human Basophil Biology from Neglect towards Understanding of Their Immune Functions.BioMed research international · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) resemble typical immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated symptoms. Clinical manifestations range from local skin reactions, gastrointestinal and/or respiratory symptoms to severe systemic involvement with potential fatal outcome. Depending on the substance group of the eliciting drug the correct diagnosis is a major challenge. Skin testing and in vitro diagnostics are often unreliable and not reproducible. The involvement of drug-specific IgE is questionable in many cases. The culprit substance (parent drug or metabolite) and potential cross-reacting compounds are difficult to identify, patient history and drug provocation testing often remain the only means for diagnosis. Hence, several groups proposed basophil activation test (BAT) for the diagnosis of immediate DHRs as basophils are well-known effector cells in allergic reactions. However, the usefulness of BAT in immediate DHRs is highly variable and dependent on the drug itself plus its capacity to spontaneously conjugate to serum proteins. Stimulation with pure solutions of the parent drug or metabolites thereof vs. drug-protein conjugates may influence sensitivity and specificity of the test. We thus, reviewed the available literature about the use of BAT for diagnosing immediate DHRs against drug classes such as antibiotics, radio contrast media, neuromuscular blocking agents, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and biologicals. Influencing factors like the selection of stimulants or of the identification and activation markers, the stimulation protocol, gating strategies, and cut-off definition are addressed in this overview on BAT performance. The overall aim is to evaluate the suitability of BAT as biomarker for the diagnosis of immediate drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.