Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27378837›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016

Benefits of Stimulus Exposure: Developmental Learning Independent of Task Performance.

David B Green, Jocelyn Ohlemacher, Merri J Rosen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Hearing and early life adversity: effects of developmental stress on sensory processing.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  3. Early-Life Stress Impairs Perception and Neural Encoding of Rapid Signals in the Auditory Pathway.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of Gap Position on Perceptual Gap Detection Across Late Childhood and Adolescence.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020
    Article
  6. Neural Variability Limits Adolescent Skill Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Brief Stimulus Exposure Fully Remediates Temporal Processing Deficits Induced by Early Hearing Loss.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David B GreenDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University Rootstown, OH, USA.
Jocelyn OhlemacherDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University Rootstown, OH, USA.
Merri J RosenDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University Rootstown, OH, USA.
Northeast Ohio Medical University · US

Funding

Auditory Processing Deficits in Early-Onset Conductive Hearing LossR01DC013314 · NIDCD · NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI ROSEN, MERRI J. · 2014 to 2024
$4.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual learning (training-induced performance improvement) can be elicited by task-irrelevant stimulus exposure in humans. In contrast, task-irrelevant stimulus exposure in animals typically disrupts perception in juveniles while causing little to no effect in adults. This may be due to the extent of exposure, which is brief in humans while chronic in animals. Here we assessed the effects of short bouts of passive stimulus exposure on learning during development in gerbils, compared with non-passive stimulus exposure (i.e., during testing). We used prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response, a method that can be applied at any age, to measure gap detection thresholds across four age groups, spanning development. First, we showed that both gap detection thresholds and gap detection learning across sessions displayed a long developmental trajectory, improving throughout the juvenile period. Additionally, we demonstrated larger within- and across-animal performance variability in younger animals. These results are generally consistent with results in humans, where there are extended developmental trajectories for both the perception of temporally-varying signals, and the effects of perceptual training, as well as increased variability and poorer performance consistency in children. We then chose an age (mid-juveniles) that displayed clear learning over sessions in order to assess effects of brief passive stimulus exposure on this learning. We compared learning in mid-juveniles exposed to either gap detection testing (gaps paired with startles) or equivalent gap exposure without testing (gaps alone) for three sessions. Learning was equivalent in both these groups and better than both naïve age-matched animals and controls receiving no gap exposure but only startle testing. Thus, short bouts of exposure to gaps independent of task performance is sufficient to induce learning at this age, and is as effective as gap detection testing.

Indexed as

adolescentadultauditory perceptiondevelopmentexperiencegap detectionlearningprepulse inhibition

Identifiers

PMID27378837
PMCPMC4911416
OpenAlexW2439789739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.