Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27378835›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016

Monitoring of Tumor Growth with [(18)F]-FET PET in a Mouse Model of Glioblastoma: SUV Measurements and Volumetric Approaches.

Adrien Holzgreve, Matthias Brendel, Song Gu, Janette Carlsen, Erik Mille, Guido Böning, Giorgia Mastrella, Marcus Unterrainer, Franz J Gildehaus, Axel Rominger and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Longitudinal [Biomedicines · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cancer Explant Models.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. [Laboratory animal research · 2018
    Article
  11. Voxel-wise analysis of dynamicEJNMMI research · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adrien HolzgreveDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of MunichMunich, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of MunichMunich, Germany.
Matthias BrendelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Song GuDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Janette CarlsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Erik MilleDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Guido BöningDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Giorgia MastrellaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Marcus UnterrainerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Franz J GildehausDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Axel RomingerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Peter BartensteinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Roland E KälinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Rainer GlassDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Nathalie L AlbertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive tumor growth monitoring is of particular interest for the evaluation of experimental glioma therapies. This study investigates the potential of positron emission tomography (PET) using O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([(18)F]-FET) to determine tumor growth in a murine glioblastoma (GBM) model-including estimation of the biological tumor volume (BTV), which has hitherto not been investigated in the pre-clinical context. Fifteen GBM-bearing mice (GL261) and six control mice (shams) were investigated during 5 weeks by PET followed by autoradiographic and histological assessments. [(18)F]-FET PET was quantitated by calculation of maximum and mean standardized uptake values within a universal volume-of-interest (VOI) corrected for healthy background (SUVmax/BG, SUVmean/BG). A partial volume effect correction (PVEC) was applied in comparison to ex vivo autoradiography. BTVs obtained by predefined thresholds for VOI definition (SUV/BG: ≥1.4; ≥1.6; ≥1.8; ≥2.0) were compared to the histologically assessed tumor volume (n = 8). Finally, individual "optimal" thresholds for BTV definition best reflecting the histology were determined. In GBM mice SUVmax/BG and SUVmean/BG clearly increased with time, however at high inter-animal variability. No relevant [(18)F]-FET uptake was observed in shams. PVEC recovered signal loss of SUVmean/BG assessment in relation to autoradiography. BTV as estimated by predefined thresholds strongly differed from the histology volume. Strikingly, the individual "optimal" thresholds for BTV assessment correlated highly with SUVmax/BG (ρ = 0.97, p < 0.001), allowing SUVmax/BG-based calculation of individual thresholds. The method was verified by a subsequent validation study (n = 15, ρ = 0.88, p < 0.01) leading to extensively higher agreement of BTV estimations when compared to histology in contrast to predefined thresholds. [(18)F]-FET PET with standard SUV measurements is feasible for glioma imaging in the GBM mouse model. PVEC is beneficial to improve accuracy of [(18)F]-FET PET SUV quantification. Although SUVmax/BG and SUVmean/BG increase during the disease course, these parameters do not correlate with the respective tumor size. For the first time, we propose a histology-verified method allowing appropriate individual BTV estimation for volumetric in vivo monitoring of tumor growth with [(18)F]-FET PET and show that standardized thresholds from routine clinical practice seem to be inappropriate for BTV estimation in the GBM mouse model.

Indexed as

[18F]-FET PETbiological tumor volume (BTV)orthotopic glioblastoma mouse model (GL261)partial volume effect correction (PVEC)tumor growth monitoring

Identifiers

PMID27378835
PMCPMC4906232
OpenAlexW2427680455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.