ArticleThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2017
Trends, characteristics, and incidence of anaphylaxis in 2001-2010: A population-based study.
Article in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Updates in the Management of Anaphylaxis: The Role of the Pediatrician.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2026Article
- Unusual Causes of Food-Induced Anaphylaxis - A Review.Indian dermatology online journal · 2026Article
- Health inequities in pediatric anaphylaxis: A policy framework and call to action for equitable care from SIAIP allergy prevention commission.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Review
- Lactate in Anaphylaxis: 100 Years On.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors for escalation to anaphylaxis from non-severe drug hypersensitivity reaction.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- A reference centre experience in central Anatolia in terms of causes, severity and treatment of childhood anaphylaxis.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2025Article
- 10 practical priorities to prevent and manage serious allergic reactions: GAClinical and translational allergy · 2024Review
- Incidence and trends of anaphylaxis among inpatients from 2003 to 2023 in Wuhan, China: A multicenter retrospective study.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2024Article
- Identifying patients at risk of anaphylaxis.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2024Review
- The Application of Knowledge-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems to Detect Antibiotic Allergy.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Trends in Anaphylaxis Hospitalizations among Adults in Spain and Their Relationship with Asthma-Analysis of Hospital Discharge data from 2016 to 2021.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Contemporary trends in anaphylaxis burden and healthcare utilisation in Western Australia: A linked data study.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023Article
- Overview of Allergy and Anaphylaxis.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2023Review
- Recent insights into the mechanisms of anaphylaxis.Current opinion in immunology · 2023Review
- Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS): Focus on the Pathophysiological and Diagnostic Role of Viruses.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Population-based incidence of all-cause anaphylaxis and its development over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in allergy · 2023Review
- Improving epinephrine autoinjector usability and carriage frequency among patients at risk of anaphylaxis: a quality improvement initiative.BMJ open quality · 2022Article
- Sex differences in carcinoid syndrome: A gap to be closed.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2022Review
- Safely Reducing Hospitalizations for Anaphylaxis in Children Through an Evidence-Based Guideline.Pediatrics · 2022Article
- Overview of Allergy and Anaphylaxis.Emergency medicine clinics of North America · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening systemic allergic reaction.
objectiveWe aimed to determine the incidence rate and causes of anaphylaxis during a 10-year period in Olmsted County, Minnesota.
methodsUsing the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a comprehensive records linkage system, we performed a population-based incidence study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 2001 through 2010. All cases with a diagnosis of anaphylactic shock and 20% of cases with related diagnoses were manually reviewed. The relationships of age group, sex, and year of anaphylaxis with incidence rates were assessed by fitting Poisson regression models.
resultsSix hundred thirty-one cases of anaphylaxis were identified. The median age was 31 years (interquartile range, 19-44 years). The overall age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate was 42 (95% CI, 38.7-45.3) per 100,000 person-years. There was a significant increase in the overall incidence of anaphylaxis during the study period, with an average increase of 4.3% per year (P < .001). In addition, there was a 9.8% increase per year in the incidence rate of food-related anaphylaxis. Food-related anaphylaxis was most common in children aged 0 to 9 years, venom-related anaphylaxis was most common in those 20 to 39 years of age, and medication-related anaphylaxis was most common in those 30 to 39 years of age.
conclusionThe overall incidence rate of anaphylaxis was 42 per 100,000 person-years from 2001-2010 in Olmsted County, Minnesota. The incidence of anaphylaxis increased over time, and several inciting triggers were uniquely associated with different age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.