Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27378439›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2016

The effects of ongoing distraction on the neural processes underlying signal detection.

Elise Demeter, Daniela De Alburquerque, Marty G Woldorff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elise DemeterCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, United States. Electronic address: emd7@duke.edu.
Daniela De AlburquerqueCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, United States.
Marty G WoldorffCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, United States.

Funding

Duke CTSA (Composite)UL1TR001117 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, LI, JENNIFER S · 2013 to 2017
$41.3M
Attentional Mechanisms in Multisensory EnvironmentsR01NS051048 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WOLDORFF, MARTY G. · 2006 to 2016
$3.5M
Training in Fundamental &Translational NeuroscienceT32NS051156 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 2005 to 2014
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001117NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051048NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS051156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distraction can impede our ability to detect and effectively process task-relevant stimuli in our environment. Here we leveraged the high temporal resolution of event-related potentials (ERPs) to study the neural consequences of a global, continuous distractor on signal-detection processes. Healthy, young adults performed the dSAT task, a translational sustained-attention task that has been used across different species and in clinical groups, in the presence and absence of ongoing distracting stimulation. We found the presence of distracting stimuli impaired participants' ability to behaviorally detect task-relevant signal stimuli and greatly affected the neural cascade of processes underlying signal detection. Specifically, we found distraction reduced an anterior and a posterior early-latency N2 ERP component (~140-220ms) and modulated long-latency, detection-related P3 components (P3a: ~200-330ms, P3b: 300-700ms), even to correctly detected targets. These data provide evidence that distraction can induce powerful alterations in the neural processes related to signal detection, even when stimuli are behaviorally detected.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceAttentionElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleFourier AnalysisHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeSignal Detection, PsychologicalTime FactorsAttentional controlDistractionElectroencephalography (EEG)Event-related potential (ERP)Signal detectionTarget detection

Identifiers

PMID27378439
PMCPMC5089870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.