Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27378206›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2016

Zinc acetate lozenges for treating the common cold: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Harri Hemilä, Edward J Petrus, James T Fitzgerald, Ananda Prasad

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04103099 (Evaluation of the Impact of the HLNatural, Inc. Immune Support Product in Reducing the Length of Cold Symptoms in Adults Suffering From the Common Cold), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04103099 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Impact of the HLNatural, Inc. Immune Support Product in Reducing the Length of Cold Symptoms in Adults Suffering From the Common Cold

TypeinterventionalSponsorHawthorne Effect Inc.Ran2019 to 2020Enrolled200ConditionsImmune System DiseasesArmsHLNatural Immune
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Zinc for prevention and treatment of the common cold.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Myth Busters: Dietary Supplements and COVID-19.The Annals of pharmacotherapy · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Harri HemiläDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. harri.hemila@helsinki.fi.
Edward J PetrusApplied Medical Research, Austin, Texas.
James T FitzgeraldDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ananda PrasadDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

Funding

Research Education CoreP30AG024824 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Neil Alexander · 2004 to 2026
$29.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this study was to determine whether the allergy status and other characteristics of common cold patients modify the effects of zinc acetate lozenges.

methodsWe had available individual patient data for three randomized placebo-controlled trials in which zinc acetate lozenges were administered to common cold patients. We used both one stage and two stage meta-analysis to estimate the effects of zinc lozenges.

resultsThe total number of common cold patients was 199, the majority being females. Eighty percent of them fell into the age range 20-50 years. One third of the patients had allergies. The one stage meta-analysis gave an overall estimate of 2.73 days (95% CI 1.8, 3.3 days) shorter colds by zinc acetate lozenge usage. The two stage meta-analysis gave an estimate of 2.94 days (95% CI 2.1, 3.8 days) reduction in common cold duration. These estimates are to be compared with the 7 day average duration of colds in the three trials. The effect of zinc lozenges was not modified by allergy status, smoking, baseline severity of the common cold, age, gender or ethnic group.

conclusionSince the effects of zinc acetate lozenges were consistent between the compared subgroups, the overall estimates for effect seemed applicable over a wide range of common cold patients. While the optimal composition of zinc lozenges and the best frequency of their administration should be further investigated, given the current evidence of efficacy, common cold patients may be encouraged to try zinc lozenges for treating their colds.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCommon ColdFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTabletsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultZinc AcetateTabletsZinc Acetatecommon coldmeta-analysisrandomized controlled trialsrespiratory tract infectionszinc acetate

Identifiers

PMID27378206
PMCPMC5061795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.