Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27378168›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2016

8q21.11 microdeletion in two patients with syndromic peters anomaly.

Hannah Happ, Kala F Schilter, Eric Weh, Linda M Reis, Elena V Semina

Open access · greenAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Loss-of-function of the Zinc Finger Homeobox 4 (medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah HappDepartment of Pediatrics and Children's Research Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Kala F SchilterDepartment of Pediatrics and Children's Research Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Eric WehDepartment of Pediatrics and Children's Research Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Linda M ReisDepartment of Pediatrics and Children's Research Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Elena V SeminaDepartment of Pediatrics and Children's Research Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin · US

Funding

MORPHOLOGY MODULEP30EY001931 · NEI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BURKE, JANICE M. · 1985 to 2016
$9.8M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR031973 · NCRR · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SHAKER, REZA NONE · 2010 to 2011
$7.9M
Molecular Mechanisms of Axenfeld-Rieger SyndromeR01EY015518 · NEI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Elena V Semina · 2005 to 2026
$5.6M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR031973NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001931NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peters anomaly is a form of anterior segment dysgenesis characterized by central ocular opacity and corneo-lenticular adhesions. Isolated and syndromic Peters anomaly can be observed and demonstrate significant genetic heterogeneity. We report the identification of overlapping 8q21.11 deletions in two patients with syndromic Peters anomaly via whole exome sequencing and chromosomal microarray analyses. Microdeletions of 8q21.11 were recently reported in 10 patients with highly variable phenotypes involving craniofacial features, ptosis, intellectual disability, abnormalities of the hands/feet and other defects; sclerocornea and/or microphthalmia were reported in three cases. The two additional cases presented in this report expand the phenotypic spectrum of 8q21.11 microdeletions to include Peters anomaly (seen in both patients) and persistent primary dentition (seen in one patient with a larger deletion). The two novel deletions include the ZFHX4 and PEX2 genes, which were also affected in all three previous cases involving ocular anomalies. Screening of the remaining alleles of ZFHX4 and PEX2 did not identify any additional likely pathogenic variants in either patient, suggesting a dominant mechanism (haploinsufficiency) for the identified deletion. This report provides further insight into the phenotypes associated with 8q21.11 deletions and, for the first time, reports Peters anomaly as an additional ocular feature; screening for copy number variations of the 8q21.11 region should be considered in patients with Peters anomaly and related syndromic features. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 8Genetic Association StudiesAnterior Eye SegmentChildComputational BiologyCorneal OpacityDNA Copy Number VariationsExomeEye AbnormalitiesFaciesFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansInfantMale8q21.11 microdeletioncopy number variationPeters anomalyPEX2ZFHX4

Identifiers

PMID27378168
PMCPMC5119633
OpenAlexW2465953669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.