Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27378133›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2017

Pursuing Authenticity From Process to Outcome in a Community-Based Participatory Research Study of Intimate Partner Violence and HIV Vulnerability in North Karnataka, India.

Andrea Katryn Blanchard, Chaitanya Aids Tadegattuva Mahila Sangha, Sapna G Nair, Raghavendra Thalinja, H S Srikantamurthy, Satyanaryana Ramanaik, Prakash Javalkar, Priya Pillai, Shajy Isac, Martine Collumbien and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andrea Katryn BlanchardUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada blancha7@myumanitoba.ca.
Chaitanya Aids Tadegattuva Mahila SanghaChaitanya Mahila Sangha, Mudhol, Karnataka, India.
Sapna G NairKarnataka Health Promotion Trust, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Raghavendra ThalinjaKarnataka Health Promotion Trust, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
H S SrikantamurthyKarnataka Health Promotion Trust, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Satyanaryana RamanaikKarnataka Health Promotion Trust, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Prakash JavalkarKarnataka Health Promotion Trust, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Priya PillaiKarnataka Health Promotion Trust, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Shajy IsacUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Martine CollumbienLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lori HeiseLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Parinita BhattacharjeeUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Sharon Gail BruceUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-based participatory research has been seen to hold great promise by researchers aiming to bridge research and action in global health programs and practice. However, there is still much debate around whether achieving authenticity in terms of in-depth collaboration between community and academic partners is possible while pursuing academic expectations for quality. This article describes the community-based methodology for a qualitative study to explore intimate partner violence and HIV/AIDS among women in sex work, or female sex workers, and their male partners in Karnataka, South India. Developed through collaborative processes, the study methodology followed an interpretive approach to qualitative inquiry, with three key components including long-term partnerships, knowledge exchange, and orientation toward action. We then discuss lessons learned on how to pursue authenticity in terms of truly collaborative processes with inherent value that also contribute to, rather than hinder, the instrumental goal of enhancing the quality and relevance of the research outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCooperative BehaviorFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIndiaIntimate Partner ViolenceMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSex Workerscommunity and public healthcommunity-based participatory researchcommunity-based programsempowermentHIV/AIDSin-depth interviewsIndiainfectionmarginalized or vulnerable populationsmethodologypowerqualitativesex workerssocial issuesSouth Asiaviolenceviolence against women

Identifiers

PMID27378133
PMCPMC5167108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.