Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27377633›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Early prediction of typical outcome and mild developmental delay for prioritisation of service delivery for very preterm and very low birthweight infants: a study protocol.

Rebecca Caesar, Roslyn N Boyd, Paul Colditz, Giovani Cioni, Robert S Ware, Kaye Salthouse, Julie Doherty, Maxine Jackson, Leanne Matthews, Tom Hurley and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reliability Study of the Items of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) Using Kappa Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neonatal risk mortality scores as predictors for health-related quality of life of infants treated in NICU: a prospective cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Rebecca CaesarFaculty of Medicine and Biomedical Science, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre (QCPRRC), South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Allied Health Women's and Families, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia.
Roslyn N BoydFaculty of Medicine and Biomedical Science, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre (QCPRRC), South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Paul ColditzFaculty of Health Sciences, The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Giovani CioniDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, Stella Maris Scientific Institute, Pisa, Italy.
Robert S WareFaculty of Medicine and Biomedical Science, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre (QCPRRC), South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia University of Queensland, School of Population Health, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Kaye SalthouseSunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Allied Health Women's and Families, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia.
Julie DohertySunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Allied Health Women's and Families, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia.
Maxine JacksonSunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Allied Health Women's and Families, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia.
Leanne MatthewsSunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Allied Health Women's and Families, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia.
Tom HurleyDepartment of Paediatrics, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia.
Anthony MorosiniDepartment of Paediatrics, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia.
Clare ThomasDepartment of Paediatrics, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia.
Laxmi CamadooDepartment of Paediatrics, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia.
Erica BaerDepartment of Paediatrics, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia.
PREMTiME Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOver 80% of very preterm (<32 weeks) and very low birthweight (<1500 g) infants will have either typical development (TD) or mild developmental delay (MDD) in multiple domains. As differentiation between TD and MDD can be difficult, infants with MDD often miss opportunities for intervention. For many clinicians, the ongoing challenge is early detection of MDD without over servicing the population. This study aims to: (1) identify early clinical biomarkers for use in this population to predict and differentiate between TD and MDD at 24 months corrected age. (2) Determine the extent to which family and caregiver factors will contribute to neurodevelopmental and behavioural outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants will be a prospective cohort of 90 infants (<32 weeks and/or <1500 g). Between 34 weeks gestational age and 16 weeks post-term, infants will have a series of 5 neurological, neuromotor, neurobehavioural and perceptual assessments including General Movement Assessment at preterm, writhing and fidgety age. Primary caregivers will complete questionnaires to identify social risk, maternal depression and family strain. Extensive perinatal data will be collected from the medical record. At 24 months, corrected age (c.a) infants will be assessed using standardised tools including the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition (Bayley III). Longitudinal trajectories of early assessment findings will be examined to determine any predictive relationship with motor and cognitive outcomes at 24 months c.a. Published data of a cohort of Australian children assessed with the Bayley III at 24 months c.a will provide a reference group of term-born controls. ETHICS: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Queensland Children's Health Services Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/13/QRCH/66), the University of Queensland (2013001019) and the Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, SC-Research Governance (SSA/13/QNB/66). Publication of all study outcomes will be in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614000480684; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentChild Health ServicesHealth PrioritiesInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightAustraliaCaregiversCognitionDevelopmental DisabilitiesEarly DiagnosisFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornNEONATOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID27377633
PMCPMC4947748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.