Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27377592›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Climate threat on the Macaronesian endemic bryophyte flora.

Jairo Patiño, Rubén G Mateo, Florian Zanatta, Adrien Marquet, Silvia C Aranda, Paulo A V Borges, Gerard Dirkse, Rosalina Gabriel, Juana M Gonzalez-Mancebo, Antoine Guisan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jairo PatiñoIsland Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Instituto de Productos Naturales y Agrobiología (IPNA-CSIC), Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain.
Rubén G MateoDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Florian ZanattaIsland Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Instituto de Productos Naturales y Agrobiología (IPNA-CSIC), Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain.
Adrien MarquetIsland Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Instituto de Productos Naturales y Agrobiología (IPNA-CSIC), Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain.
Silvia C ArandaMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Paulo A V BorgesCentre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c)/Azorean Biodiversity Group &University of the Azores, Angra do Heroísmo, Azores, Portugal.
Gerard DirkseNatuurmuseum Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rosalina GabrielCentre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c)/Azorean Biodiversity Group &University of the Azores, Angra do Heroísmo, Azores, Portugal.
Juana M Gonzalez-ManceboDepartment of Plant Biology, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Antoine GuisanDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jesús MuñozReal Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Manuela Sim-SimCentre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências de Lisboa, Lisboa and Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência, Jardim Botânico, Lisboa, Portugal.
Alain VanderpoortenCentre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c)/Azorean Biodiversity Group &University of the Azores, Angra do Heroísmo, Azores, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oceanic islands are of fundamental importance for the conservation of biodiversity because they exhibit high endemism rates coupled with fast extinction rates. Nowhere in Europe is this pattern more conspicuous than in the Macaronesian biogeographic region. A large network of protected areas within the region has been developed, but the question of whether these areas will still be climatically suitable for the globally threatened endemic element in the coming decades remains open. Here, we make predictions on the fate of the Macaronesian endemic bryophyte flora in the context of ongoing climate change. The potential distribution of 35 Macaronesian endemic bryophyte species was assessed under present and future climate conditions using an ensemble modelling approach. Projections of the models under different climate change scenarios predicted an average decrease of suitable areas of 62-87% per species and a significant elevational increase by 2070, so that even the commonest species were predicted to fit either the Vulnerable or Endangered IUCN categories. Complete extinctions were foreseen for six of the studied Macaronesian endemic species. Given the uncertainty regarding the capacity of endemic species to track areas of suitable climate within and outside the islands, active management associated to an effective monitoring program is suggested.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeIslandsBryophytaEuropeOceans and SeasSpecies SpecificityTemperature

Identifiers

PMID27377592
PMCPMC4932530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.