ArticlePediatric cardiology2016
Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Pediatric Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Comparison Between Sequential and Third-Generation Dual-Source High-Pitch Spiral Techniques.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world impact of high-pitch helical CT on radiation exposure and image quality in infants being evaluated for cardiothoracic pathologies.Pediatric radiology · 2025Article
- A multi-disciplinary, comprehensive approach to management of children with heterotaxy.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Review
- Dual-source computed tomography coronary artery imaging in children.Pediatric radiology · 2019Review
- The feasibility of high-pitch acquisition protocol for imaging of the pediatric abdomen by dual-source CT.Japanese journal of radiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a reduction in radiation dose and improvement in image quality of pediatric cardiac computed tomography scans performed using the high-pitch spiral technique on a new third-generation dual-source 2 × 192-slice scanner (group B) compared with scans performed using the sequential technique on a single-source 256-slice scanner (group A). We performed a retrospective observational study on 40 patients aged ≤18 years who underwent prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered cardiac computed tomography. Image quality was assessed by pre-defined objective indices and a four-point subjective score. Apart from a higher mean heart rate in group A (P = 0.016), there were otherwise no significant inter-group differences in patient characteristics. The median effective dose was 4.41 mSv (interquartile range 2.58-5.90 mSv) in group A and 0.52 mSv (interquartile range 0.39-0.59 mSv) in group B (P < 0.001), representing a 88 % reduction. Subjective image quality score was significantly better in group B (4 = excellent with no artifact, mode 57.1 %) than in group A (3 = good with mild artifact, mode 57.9 %) (P < 0.001). Noise index, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio between both groups were not statistically significant. New third-generation dual-source high-pitch spiral scan technique can deliver excellent image quality with low radiation dose. Our results suggest that it should be considered as a first-choice technique for performing cardiac computed tomography in the pediatric population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27377528What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.