Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27377222›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2016

A multi-time-point modality-agnostic patch-based method for lesion filling in multiple sclerosis.

Ferran Prados, Manuel Jorge Cardoso, Baris Kanber, Olga Ciccarelli, Raju Kapoor, Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott, Sebastien Ourselin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Data-Driven Fatigue Trajectories in Multiple Sclerosis and Their Predictors.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ferran PradosTranslational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, Malet Place Engineering Building, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK; NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, 1st Floor, Russell Square House, 10-12 Russell Square, London WC1B 5EH, UK. Electronic address: f.carrasco@ucl.ac.uk.
Manuel Jorge CardosoTranslational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, Malet Place Engineering Building, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Baris KanberTranslational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, Malet Place Engineering Building, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Olga CiccarelliNMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, 1st Floor, Russell Square House, 10-12 Russell Square, London WC1B 5EH, UK.
Raju KapoorDepartment of Neuroinflammation, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-KingshottNMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, 1st Floor, Russell Square House, 10-12 Russell Square, London WC1B 5EH, UK; Brain MRI 3T Center, C. Mondino National Neurological Institute, Pavia, Italy.
Sebastien OurselinTranslational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, Malet Place Engineering Building, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK; Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J01107X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis lesions influence the process of image analysis, leading to tissue segmentation problems and biased morphometric estimates. Existing techniques try to reduce this bias by filling all lesions as normal-appearing white matter on T1-weighted images, considering each time-point separately. However, due to lesion segmentation errors and the presence of structures adjacent to the lesions, such as the ventricles and deep grey matter nuclei, filling all lesions with white matter-like intensities introduces errors and artefacts. In this paper, we present a novel lesion filling strategy inspired by in-painting techniques used in computer graphics applications for image completion. The proposed technique uses a five-dimensional (5D), patch-based (multi-modality and multi-time-point), Non-Local Means algorithm that fills lesions with the most plausible texture. We demonstrate that this strategy introduces less bias, fewer artefacts and spurious edges than the current, publicly available techniques. The proposed method is modality-agnostic and can be applied to multiple time-points simultaneously. In addition, it preserves anatomical structures and signal-to-noise characteristics even when the lesions are neighbouring grey matter or cerebrospinal fluid, and avoids excess of blurring or rasterisation due to the choice of the segmentation plane, shape of the lesions, and their size and/or location.

Indexed as

AdultArtifactsBrainBrain MappingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedWhite MatterArtefactsError correctionLesionsMRIMultiple sclerosisSegmentation errors

Identifiers

PMID27377222
PMCPMC4988790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.