Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27377071›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2016

Retention during capsule endoscopy: Is it a real problem in routine practice?

Asli Cifcibasi Ormeci, Filiz Akyuz, Bulent Baran, Suut Gokturk, Tugrul Ormeci, Binnur Pinarbasi, Ozlem Mutluay Soyer, Sami Evirgen, Umit Akyuz, Cetin Karaca and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Small Bowel Video Capsule Endoscopy Guidance in Practice: Expert Opinion Report.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. What is the effective clinical use of small bowel capsule endoscopy in real life?The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gastrointestinal Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis: An Update.Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Asli Cifcibasi OrmeciDepartment of Gastroenterohepatology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Filiz AkyuzDepartment of Gastroenterohepatology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey filizakyuz@hotmail.com.
Bulent BaranDepartment of Gastroenterology, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Suut GokturkDepartment of Gastroenterohepatology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tugrul OrmeciDepartment of Radiology, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Binnur PinarbasiDepartment of Gastroenterohepatology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ozlem Mutluay SoyerDepartment of Gastroenterohepatology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sami EvirgenDepartment of Gastroenterohepatology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Umit AkyuzDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cetin KaracaDepartment of Gastroenterohepatology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kadir DemirDepartment of Gastroenterohepatology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sabahattin KaymakogluDepartment of Gastroenterohepatology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fatih BesisikDepartment of Gastroenterohepatology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluated the risks and outcomes of capsule retention during capsule endoscopy (CE) for investigating small bowel disease. Capsule retention is the most serious complication of CE.

methodsBefore CE, the gastrointestinal tract was evaluated for blockages with computerized tomography. Analysis of CE was made retrospectively.

resultsCapsule endoscopy was used to investigate obscure bleeding (90.2%; n = 324) or other symptoms (9.8%; n = 35). The capsule retention rate was 11/359 (3.1%); it was retained in a malignant lesion area (adenocarcinoma or melanoma) in two patients (18.2%), in the small bowel in an ulcerated area in five patients (45.5%), and in the oesophagus/stomach in four patients (36.4%) due to dysmotility. None of the patients had symptoms of obstruction.

conclusionsScanning patients before CE did not predict capsule retention. Retention is a complication of CE, but occurs as a result of the underlying disease. The risk of retention is increased in patients with motility disorders, suspected small bowel ulcers or malignancies.

Indexed as

Capsule EndoscopyPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAgedDemographyDouble-Balloon EnteroscopyFemaleHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCapsule endoscopycapsule retentionpatency capsulesmall bowel

Identifiers

PMID27377071
PMCPMC5536635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.