Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27376682›Full record

ArticleNature materials2016

Mechanical plasticity of cells.

Navid Bonakdar, Richard Gerum, Michael Kuhn, Marina Spörrer, Anna Lippert, Werner Schneider, Katerina E Aifantis, Ben Fabry

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature materials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Next-Generation Hydrogels for Biliary Organoid Engineering.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Shape, Strain, and Stability: Epithelia Under High Strain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. SEMAPL bioengineering · 2023
    Article
  15. A mechanism-based theory of cellular and tissue plasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Navid BonakdarDepartment of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Richard GerumDepartment of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5893-2650
Michael KuhnDepartment of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Marina SpörrerDepartment of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Anna LippertDepartment of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Werner SchneiderDepartment of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Katerina E AifantisDepartment of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.
Ben FabryDepartment of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under mechanical loading, most living cells show a viscoelastic deformation that follows a power law in time. After removal of the mechanical load, the cell shape recovers only incompletely to its original undeformed configuration. Here, we show that incomplete shape recovery is due to an additive plastic deformation that displays the same power-law dynamics as the fully reversible viscoelastic deformation response. Moreover, the plastic deformation is a constant fraction of the total cell deformation and originates from bond ruptures within the cytoskeleton. A simple extension of the prevailing viscoelastic power-law response theory with a plastic element correctly predicts the cell behaviour under cyclic loading. Our findings show that plastic energy dissipation during cell deformation is tightly linked to elastic cytoskeletal stresses, which suggests the existence of an adaptive mechanism that protects the cell against mechanical damage.

Identifiers

PMID27376682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.