Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27376488›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2016

The life aquatic: advances in marine vertebrate genomics.

Joanna L Kelley, Anthony P Brown, Nina Overgaard Therkildsen, Andrew D Foote

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rapid radiation in a highly diverse marine environment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Comparative genomics provides insights into the aquatic adaptations of mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Restricted dispersal in a sea of gene flow.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in genetics · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joanna L KelleySchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, PO Box 644236, Pullman, Washington 99164, USA.
Anthony P BrownSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, PO Box 644236, Pullman, Washington 99164, USA.
Nina Overgaard TherkildsenDepartment of Natural Resources, Cornell University, 208 Fernow Hall, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Andrew D FooteInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, Bern CH-3012, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ocean is hypothesized to be where life on earth originated, and subsequent evolutionary transitions between marine and terrestrial environments have been key events in the origin of contemporary biodiversity. Here, we review how comparative genomic approaches are an increasingly important aspect of understanding evolutionary processes, such as physiological and morphological adaptation to the diverse habitats within the marine environment. In addition, we highlight how population genomics has provided unprecedented resolution for population structuring, speciation and adaptation in marine environments, which can have a low cost of dispersal and few physical barriers to gene flow, and can thus support large populations. Building upon this work, we outline the applications of genomics tools to conservation and their relevance to assessing the wide-ranging impact of fisheries and climate change on marine species.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAnimalsAquacultureAquatic OrganismsBiotechnologyGenomics

Identifiers

PMID27376488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.