Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27376325›Full record

ReviewToxins2016

Therapeutic Effectiveness of Anticancer Phytochemicals on Cancer Stem Cells.

Jisun Oh, Lynn Hlatky, Yong-Seob Jeong, Dohoon Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Chemopreventive and therapeutic effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Effects of Isoflavone-Rich NADES Extract ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chemopreventive and Therapeutic Efficacy ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. CEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dietary Phytochemicals Targeting Cancer Stem Cells.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jisun OhSchool of Food Science and Biotechnology (BK21 Plus), Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea. j.oh@knu.ac.kr.
Lynn HlatkyCenter of Cancer Systems Biology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA. hlatky@cancer-systems-biology.org.
Yong-Seob JeongDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea. ysjeong@jbnu.ac.kr.
Dohoon KimDepartment of Integrative Physiology and Pathobiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA. dohoon.kim@tufts.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how to target cancer stem cells (CSCs) may provide helpful insights for the development of therapeutic or preventive strategies against cancers. Dietary phytochemicals with anticancer properties are promising candidates and have selective impact on CSCs. This review summarizes the influence of phytochemicals on heterogeneous cancer cell populations as well as on specific targeting of CSCs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBiomarkers, TumorHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsPhenotypePhytochemicalsSignal TransductionAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBiomarkers, TumorPhytochemicalsanticancercancercancer stem cellsphytochemicalspolyphenols

Identifiers

PMID27376325
PMCPMC4963832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.