Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27376320›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Approaches to Children's Exposure Assessment: Case Study with Diethylhexylphthalate (DEHP).

Gary Ginsberg, Justine Ginsberg, Brenda Foos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Role of sleep in asthenospermia induced by di (2-ethyl-hexyl) phthalate.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Phthalates and type 1 diabetes: is there any link?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A Review of the Field on Children's Exposure to Environmental Contaminants: A Risk Assessment Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gary GinsbergPartnership in Pediatric and Environment Health, Granby, CT 06026, USA. hologram7942@yahoo.com.
Justine GinsbergPartnership in Pediatric and Environment Health, Granby, CT 06026, USA. justine1973@hotmail.com.
Brenda FoosUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Children's Health Protection, Washington, DC 20460, USA. foos.brenda@epa.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children's exposure assessment is a key input into epidemiology studies, risk assessment and source apportionment. The goals of this article are to describe a methodology for children's exposure assessment that can be used for these purposes and to apply the methodology to source apportionment for the case study chemical, diethylhexylphthalate (DEHP). A key feature is the comparison of total (aggregate) exposure calculated via a pathways approach to that derived from a biomonitoring approach. The 4-step methodology and its results for DEHP are: (1) Prioritization of life stages and exposure pathways, with pregnancy, breast-fed infants, and toddlers the focus of the case study and pathways selected that are relevant to these groups; (2) Estimation of pathway-specific exposures by life stage wherein diet was found to be the largest contributor for pregnant women, breast milk and mouthing behavior for the nursing infant and diet, house dust, and mouthing for toddlers; (3) Comparison of aggregate exposure by pathways vs biomonitoring-based approaches wherein good concordance was found for toddlers and pregnant women providing confidence in the exposure assessment; (4) Source apportionment in which DEHP presence in foods, children's products, consumer products and the built environment are discussed with respect to early life mouthing, house dust and dietary exposure. A potential fifth step of the method involves the calculation of exposure doses for risk assessment which is described but outside the scope for the current case study. In summary, the methodology has been used to synthesize the available information to identify key sources of early life exposure to DEHP.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolDietDiethylhexyl PhthalateDustEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHumansInfantMilk, HumanPregnancyRisk AssessmentDiethylhexyl PhthalateDustbreast milkchildrencontaminantsDEHPexposure assessmenthouse dustphthalateplasticizerpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID27376320
PMCPMC4962211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.