ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2016
In Situ Electron Microscopy of Lactomicroselenium Particles in Probiotic Bacteria.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antiviral activity of green synthesized selenium nanoparticles alone and in combination with chitosan against SARS-CoV-2.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Exploring the Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidative Potential of Selenium Nanoparticles Biosynthesized by Lactobacillus casei 393 on an Inflamed Caco-2 Cell Line.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2024Article
- CD44-targeting hyaluronic acid-selenium nanoparticles boost functional recovery following spinal cord injury.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- Mitigation of Imidacloprid Toxicity in Poultry Chicken by Selenium Nanoparticles: Growth Performance, Lipid Peroxidation, and Blood Traits.Biological trace element research · 2023Article
- Biological Selenite Reduction, Characterization and Bioactivities of Selenium Nanoparticles Biosynthesised byMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Different Surface Coating Agents for Selenium Nanoparticles: Enhanced Anti-Inflammatory Activity and Drug Loading Capacity.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Article
- Protective Effects of Selenium Nanoparticle-Enriched Lactococcus lactis NZ9000 against Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88-Induced Intestinal Barrier Damage in Mice.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021Article
- In Vivo Bioavailability of Selenium in Selenium-EnrichedAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effects of Selenium- and Zinc-EnrichedAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Identifying different types of microorganisms with terahertz spectroscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Probiotics: If It Does Not Help It Does Not Do Any Harm. Really?Microorganisms · 2019Review
- Biosynthesis of Polysaccharides-Capped Selenium Nanoparticles UsingFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Biogenic Synthesis of Novel Functionalized Selenium Nanoparticles byFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- TwoFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Characteristics ofJournal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electron microscopy was used to test whether or not (a) in statu nascendi synthesized, and in situ measured, nanoparticle size does not differ significantly from the size of nanoparticles after their purification; and (b) the generation of selenium is detrimental to the bacterial strains that produce them. Elemental nano-sized selenium produced by probiotic latic acid bacteria was used as a lactomicroselenium (lactomicroSel) inhibitor of cell growth in the presence of lactomicroSel, and was followed by time-lapse microscopy. The size of lactomicroSel produced by probiotic bacteria was measured in situ and after isolation and purification. For these measurements the TESLA BS 540 transmission electron microscope was converted from analog (aTEM) to digital processing (dTEM), and further to remote-access internet electron microscopy (iTEM). Lactobacillus acidophilus produced fewer, but larger, lactomicroSel nanoparticles (200-350 nm) than Lactobacillus casei (L. casei), which generated many, smaller lactomicroSel particles (85-200 nm) and grains as a cloudy, less electrodense material. Streptococcus thermophilus cells generated selenoparticles (60-280 nm) in a suicidic manner. The size determined in situ in lactic acid bacteria was significantly lower than those measured by scanning electron microscopy after the isolation of lactomicroSel particles obtained from lactobacilli (100-500 nm), but higher relative to those isolated from Streptococcus thermopilus (50-100 nm). These differences indicate that smaller lactomicroSel particles could be more toxic to the producing bacteria themselves and discrepancies in size could have implications with respect to the applications of selenium nanoparticles as prebiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.