Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27376279›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

In Situ Electron Microscopy of Lactomicroselenium Particles in Probiotic Bacteria.

Gabor Nagy, Gyula Pinczes, Gabor Pinter, Istvan Pocsi, Jozsef Prokisch, Gaspar Banfalvi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. In Vivo Bioavailability of Selenium in Selenium-EnrichedAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Effects of Selenium- and Zinc-EnrichedAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. TwoFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  15. Characteristics ofJournal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabor NagyDepartment of Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen 4010, Hungary. bigdegu@gmail.com.
Gyula PinczesDepartment of Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen 4010, Hungary. pigyu@freemail.hu.
Gabor PinterDepartment of Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen 4010, Hungary. pintyo@gmail.com.
Istvan PocsiDepartment of Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen 4010, Hungary. ipocsi@gmail.com.
Jozsef ProkischDepartment of Animal Breeding, University of Debrecen, Debrecen 4010, Hungary. jprokisch@agr.unideb.hu.
Gaspar BanfalviDepartment of Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen 4010, Hungary. gaspar.banfalvi@gmail.com.
University of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electron microscopy was used to test whether or not (a) in statu nascendi synthesized, and in situ measured, nanoparticle size does not differ significantly from the size of nanoparticles after their purification; and (b) the generation of selenium is detrimental to the bacterial strains that produce them. Elemental nano-sized selenium produced by probiotic latic acid bacteria was used as a lactomicroselenium (lactomicroSel) inhibitor of cell growth in the presence of lactomicroSel, and was followed by time-lapse microscopy. The size of lactomicroSel produced by probiotic bacteria was measured in situ and after isolation and purification. For these measurements the TESLA BS 540 transmission electron microscope was converted from analog (aTEM) to digital processing (dTEM), and further to remote-access internet electron microscopy (iTEM). Lactobacillus acidophilus produced fewer, but larger, lactomicroSel nanoparticles (200-350 nm) than Lactobacillus casei (L. casei), which generated many, smaller lactomicroSel particles (85-200 nm) and grains as a cloudy, less electrodense material. Streptococcus thermophilus cells generated selenoparticles (60-280 nm) in a suicidic manner. The size determined in situ in lactic acid bacteria was significantly lower than those measured by scanning electron microscopy after the isolation of lactomicroSel particles obtained from lactobacilli (100-500 nm), but higher relative to those isolated from Streptococcus thermopilus (50-100 nm). These differences indicate that smaller lactomicroSel particles could be more toxic to the producing bacteria themselves and discrepancies in size could have implications with respect to the applications of selenium nanoparticles as prebiotics.

Indexed as

Cell LineCell ProliferationHumansLacticaseibacillus caseiLactobacillus acidophilusMicroscopy, ElectronNanoparticlesParticle SizeProbioticsSeleniumStreptococcus thermophilusSeleniumlactobacillilactomicroSelnanoparticlesStreptococcus thermophilus (S. thermophilus)transmission electronmicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID27376279
PMCPMC4964423
OpenAlexW2467671738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.