Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27376032›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2016

Interactions "Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum"-Bactericera cockerelli: Haplotype Effect on Vector Fitness and Gene Expression Analyses.

Jianxiu Yao, Panatda Saenkham, Julien Levy, Freddy Ibanez, Christophe Noroy, Azucena Mendoza, Ordom Huot, Damien F Meyer, Cecilia Tamborindeguy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Interactions ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jianxiu YaoDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University College Station, TX, USA.
Panatda SaenkhamDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University College Station, TX, USA.
Julien LevyDepartment of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University College Station, TX, USA.
Freddy IbanezDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University College Station, TX, USA.
Christophe NoroyCIRAD, UMR CMAEEPetit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR1309 CMAEEMontpellier, France; Université des Antilles, Pointe-à-PitreGuadeloupe, France.
Azucena MendozaDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University College Station, TX, USA.
Ordom HuotDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University College Station, TX, USA.
Damien F MeyerCIRAD, UMR CMAEEPetit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR1309 CMAEEMontpellier, France.
Cecilia TamborindeguyDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum" (Lso) has emerged as a serious threat world-wide. Five Lso haplotypes have been identified so far. Haplotypes A and B are present in the Americas and/or New Zealand, where they are vectored to solanaceous plants by the potato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli (Šulc) (Hemiptera: Triozidae). The fastidious nature of these pathogens has hindered the study of the interactions with their eukaryotic hosts (vector and plant). To understand the strategies used by these pathogens to infect their vector, the effects of each Lso haplotype (A or B) on psyllid fitness was investigated, and genome-wide transcriptomic and RT-qPCR analyses were performed to evaluate Lso gene expression in association with its vector. Results showed that psyllids infected with haplotype B had significantly lower percentage of nymphal survival compared to psyllids infected with haplotype A. Although overall gene expression across Lso genome was similar between the two Lso haplotypes, differences in the expression of key candidate genes were found. Among the 16 putative type IV effector genes tested, four of them were differentially expressed between Lso haplotypes, while no differences in gene expression were measured by qPCR or transcriptomic analysis for the rest of the genes. This study provides new information regarding the pathogenesis of Lso haplotypes in their insect vector.

Indexed as

HaplotypesHost-Pathogen InteractionsAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingHemipteraInsect VectorsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRhizobiaceaeSurvival AnalysisBactericera cockerelliCandidatus Liberibacter solanacearumeffectorsLso haplotypepsyllid

Identifiers

PMID27376032
PMCPMC4899927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.