Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27376004›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2016

Determination of optimal parameters of MAFFT program based on BAliBASE3.0 database.

HaiXia Long, ManZhi Li, HaiYan Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

HaiXia LongSchool of Information Science Technology, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, 571158 HaiNan China.
ManZhi LiSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, 571158 HaiNan China.
HaiYan FuSchool of Information Science Technology, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, 571158 HaiNan China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple sequence alignment (MSA) is one of the most important research contents in bioinformatics. A number of MSA programs have emerged. The accuracy of MSA programs highly depends on the parameters setting, mainly including gap open penalties (GOP), gap extension penalties (GEP) and substitution matrix (SM). This research tries to obtain the optimal GOP, GEP and SM rather than MAFFT default parameters.

resultsThe paper discusses the MAFFT program benchmarked on BAliBASE3.0 database, and the optimal parameters of MAFFT program are obtained, which are better than the default parameters of CLUSTALW and MAFFT program.

conclusionsThe optimal parameters can improve the results of multiple sequence alignment, which is feasible and efficient.

Indexed as

Default parametersGap extension penaltiesGap open penaltiesMAFFT programMultiple sequence alignmentSubstitution matrix

Identifiers

PMID27376004
PMCPMC4909661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.