Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27375948›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2016

Dynamic absorption and scattering of water and hydrogel during high-repetition-rate (>100 MHz) burst-mode ultrafast-pulse laser ablation.

Zuoming Qian, Andrés Covarrubias, Alexander W Grindal, Margarete K Akens, Lothar Lilge, Robin S Marjoribanks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zuoming QianDepartment of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, Canada.
Andrés CovarrubiasDepartment of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, Canada.
Alexander W GrindalDepartment of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, Canada.
Margarete K AkensTechna Institute, University Health Network, 100 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1P5, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Lothar LilgeDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1L7, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Robin S MarjoribanksDepartment of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-repetition-rate burst-mode ultrafast-laser ablation and disruption of biological tissues depends on interaction of each pulse with the sample, but under those particular conditions which persist from previous pulses. This work characterizes and compares the dynamics of absorption and scattering of a 133-MHz repetition-rate, burst-mode ultrafast-pulse laser, in agar hydrogel targets and distilled water. The differences in energy partition are quantified, pulse-by-pulse, using a time-resolving integrating-sphere-based device. These measurements reveal that high-repetition-rate burst-mode ultrafast-laser ablation is a highly dynamical process affected by the persistence of ionization, dissipation of plasma plume, neutral material flow, tissue tensile strength, and the hydrodynamic oscillation of cavitation bubbles.

Indexed as

(140.7090) Ultrafast lasers(160.1435) Biomaterials(170.1020) Ablation of tissue

Identifiers

PMID27375948
PMCPMC4918586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.