ArticleBiomicrofluidics2016
Refinement of current monitoring methodology for electroosmotic flow assessment under low ionic strength conditions.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrophoresis: An Effective Viability Assessment Method across Cell Domains.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- A Simple Microfluidic Device to Mitigate the Effect of Faradaic Reactions in Cross-Stream Particle Migration in DC-Electrokinetics.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Development of a DC-Biased AC-Stimulated Microfluidic Device for the Electrokinetic Separation of Bacterial and Yeast Cells.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Assessment of the Nonlinear Electrophoretic Migration of Nanoparticles and Bacteriophages.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Switching Separation Migration Order by Switching Electrokinetic Regime in Electrokinetic Microsystems.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Assessing the Discriminatory Capabilities of iEK Devices under DC and DC-Biased AC Stimulation Potentials.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Particle trapping in electrically driven insulator-based microfluidics: Dielectrophoresis and induced-charge electrokinetics.Electrophoresis · 2021Review
- Fine-Tuning Electrokinetic Injections Considering Nonlinear Electrokinetic Effects in Insulator-Based Devices.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Electrokinetic characterization of synthetic protein nanoparticles.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2020Article
- Low frequency cyclical potentials for fine tuning insulator-based dielectrophoretic separations.Biomicrofluidics · 2019Article
- Electrokinetic instability in microchannel ferrofluid/water co-flows.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Enhanced Throughput for Electrokinetic Manipulation of Particles and Cells in a Stacked Microfluidic Device.Micromachines · 2016Article
- Preface to Special Topic: Selected Papers from the 2015 Annual Meeting of the AES Electrophoresis Society in Salt Lake City, Utah.Biomicrofluidics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current monitoring is a well-established technique for the characterization of electroosmotic (EO) flow in microfluidic devices. This method relies on monitoring the time response of the electric current when a test buffer solution is displaced by an auxiliary solution using EO flow. In this scheme, each solution has a different ionic concentration (and electric conductivity). The difference in the ionic concentration of the two solutions defines the dynamic time response of the electric current and, hence, the current signal to be measured: larger concentration differences result in larger measurable signals. A small concentration difference is needed, however, to avoid dispersion at the interface between the two solutions, which can result in undesired pressure-driven flow that conflicts with the EO flow. Additional challenges arise as the conductivity of the test solution decreases, leading to a reduced electric current signal that may be masked by noise during the measuring process, making for a difficult estimation of an accurate EO mobility. This contribution presents a new scheme for current monitoring that employs multiple channels arranged in parallel, producing an increase in the signal-to-noise ratio of the electric current to be measured and increasing the estimation accuracy. The use of this parallel approach is particularly useful in the estimation of the EO mobility in systems where low conductivity mediums are required, such as insulator based dielectrophoresis devices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.