Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27375714›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences

Intravenous ketamine, propofol and propofol-ketamine combination used for pediatric dental sedation: A randomized clinical study.

Dilek Gunay Canpolat, Mustafa Denizhan Yildirim, Recep Aksu, Nukhet Kutuk, Alper Alkan, Kenan Cantekin

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03827408 (Nebulized Midazolam, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combination in Sedation of Preschoolers Undergoing Dental Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03827408 phase2completednot on this map

Nebulized Midazolam, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combination in Sedation of Preschoolers Undergoing Dental Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNourhan M.AlyRan2017 to 2019Enrolled72ConditionsDental AnxietyArmsMidazolam group (MDZ), Dexmedetomidine group (DEX), Combination of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine (MDZ/DEX)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Ketamine-propofol (ketofol) in procedural sedation: a narrative review.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dilek Gunay CanpolatDilek Gunay Canpolat, Anesthesiologist, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Kayseri, Turkey.
Mustafa Denizhan YildirimMustafa Denizhan Yildirim, Anesthesiologist, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Kayseri, Turkey.
Recep AksuRecep Aksu, Department of Anesthesiology, Erciyes University Medical Faculty, Kayseri, Turkey.
Nukhet KutukNukhet Kutuk, Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Kayseri, Turkey.
Alper AlkanAlper Alkan, Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Kayseri, Turkey.
Kenan CantekinKenan Cantekin, Pediatric Dentist, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Kayseri, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveDental treatments cannot bealways performed under local anesthesia inpediatric non-cooperative patients. For this purpose, differentanesthetic techniques have been applied to increase patient comport to dental treatments.

methodsSixty children classified as ASA I-II, between aged 3 to 9, who were scheduled to undergo tooth extraction, were enrolled for this randomized study. Group K received 1 mg/kg ketamine, Group P received 1 mg/kg propofol, and Group KP received 0.5 mg/kg propofol plus 0.5 mg/kg ketamine intravenously for anesthesia induction.

resultsRecovery time was significantly lower in Group P than Group KP. No significant differences were found between groups regarding HR, before and after the induction, at tenth minute. Fifth minute's HR was higher in Group K than Group KP. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) values were similar at baseline, before and after the induction, and at tenth minute, whereas significantly lower values were found in Group P and Group KP than in Group K at fifth minute.

conclusionsAlthough ketamine, propofol and ketamine-propofol combination are effective for sedation in tooth extraction in pediatric patients, propofol may be an excellent alternative, with the shortest recovery, no nausea and vomiting, and reasonable surgical satisfaction.

Indexed as

KetaminePropofolSedationTooth extraction

Identifiers

PMID27375714
PMCPMC4928423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.