Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27375600›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Genetic Manipulation of Competition for Nitrate between Heterotrophic Bacteria and Diatoms.

Rachel E Diner, Sarah M Schwenck, John P McCrow, Hong Zheng, Andrew E Allen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. mBio · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Marine bacteriamBio · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Vitamin BISME communications · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Diatom modulation of select bacteria through use of two unique secondary metabolites.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel E DinerIntegrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San DiegoLa Jolla, CA, USA; Microbial and Environmental Genomics Group, J. Craig Venter InstituteLa Jolla, CA, USA.
Sarah M SchwenckIntegrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San DiegoLa Jolla, CA, USA; Microbial and Environmental Genomics Group, J. Craig Venter InstituteLa Jolla, CA, USA.
John P McCrowMicrobial and Environmental Genomics Group, J. Craig Venter Institute La Jolla, CA, USA.
Hong ZhengMicrobial and Environmental Genomics Group, J. Craig Venter Institute La Jolla, CA, USA.
Andrew E AllenIntegrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San DiegoLa Jolla, CA, USA; Microbial and Environmental Genomics Group, J. Craig Venter InstituteLa Jolla, CA, USA.
J. Craig Venter Institute · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diatoms are a dominant group of eukaryotic phytoplankton that contribute substantially to global primary production and the cycling of important elements such as carbon and nitrogen. Heterotrophic bacteria, including members of the gammaproteobacteria, are commonly associated with diatom populations and may rely on them for organic carbon while potentially competing with them for other essential nutrients. Considering that bacterioplankton drive oceanic release of CO 2 (i.e., bacterial respiration) while diatoms drive ocean carbon sequestration vial the biological pump, the outcome of such competition could influence the direction and magnitude of carbon flux in the upper ocean. Nitrate availability is commonly a determining factor for the growth of diatom populations, particularly in coastal and upwelling regions. Diatoms as well as many bacterial species can utilize nitrate, however the ability of bacteria to compete for nitrate may be hindered by carbon limitation. Here we have developed a genetically tractable model system using the pennate diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum and the widespread heterotrophic bacteria Alteromonas macleodii to examine carbon-nitrogen dynamics. While subsisting solely on P. tricornutum derived carbon, A. macleodii does not appear to be an effective competitor for nitrate, and may in fact benefit the diatom; particularly in stationary phase. However, allochthonous dissolved organic carbon addition in the form of pyruvate triggers A. macleodii proliferation and nitrate uptake, leading to reduced P. tricornutum growth. Nitrate reductase deficient mutants of A. macleodii (ΔnasA) do not exhibit such explosive growth and associated competitive ability in response to allochthonous carbon when nitrate is the sole nitrogen source, but could survive by utilizing solely P. tricornutum-derived nitrogen. Furthermore, allocthonous carbon addition enables wild-type A. macleodii to rescue nitrate reductase deficient P. tricornutum populations from nitrogen starvation, and RNA-seq transcriptomic evidence supports nitrogen-based interactions between diatoms and bacteria at the molecular level. This study provides key insights into the roles of carbon and nitrogen in phytoplankton-bacteria dynamics and lays the foundation for developing a mechanistic understanding of these interactions using co-culturing and genetic manipulation.

Indexed as

Alteromonasbacteriacompetitiondiatomsgenetic manipulationnitratePhaeodactylumtranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID27375600
PMCPMC4899447
OpenAlexW2413368592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.