Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27375594›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Relationship between Cefquinome PK/PD Parameters and Emergence of Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in Rabbit Tissue-Cage Infection Model.

Mingpeng Xiong, Xun Wu, Xiaomei Ye, Longfei Zhang, Shuyi Zeng, Zilong Huang, Yuzhi Wu, Jian Sun, Huanzhong Ding

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mingpeng XiongNational Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Microorganisms of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University Guangzhou, China.
Xun WuNational Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Microorganisms of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University Guangzhou, China.
Xiaomei YeNational Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Microorganisms of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University Guangzhou, China.
Longfei ZhangNational Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Microorganisms of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University Guangzhou, China.
Shuyi ZengNational Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Microorganisms of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University Guangzhou, China.
Zilong HuangNational Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Microorganisms of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University Guangzhou, China.
Yuzhi WuNational Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Microorganisms of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University Guangzhou, China.
Jian SunNational Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Microorganisms of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University Guangzhou, China.
Huanzhong DingNational Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Microorganisms of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University Guangzhou, China.
South China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to explore the relationship between different antibiotic dosing regimens and selective enrichment of resistant strains, tissue-cage infection model was established in rabbits to study relationship between cefquinome pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters and the change of susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). In this model, above 10(8) CFU/mL of S. aureus culture were exposed to cefquinome concentrations below the MIC99 (the minimal concentration that inhibits colony formation by 99% in vitro, 0.3 μg/mL), between the MIC99 and the MPC (the mutant prevent concentration in vitro, 1.6 μg/mL), and above the MPC after intramuscular injection with cefquinome at doses of 4, 8, 16, and 32 mg/kg of body weight (bw) once daily for 5 days or 4, 8, 16, and 24 mg/kg of bw twice daily for 2.5 days. Samples of tissue-cage fluid were collected from the tissue-cage at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 h after each dosing (one dosing daily) or at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h (two dosing daily). Cefquinome concentration, susceptibility of S. aureus to cefquinome, and bacterial numbers at the infected site were monitored. The MICs of S. aureus and the fraction of resistant bacteria both increased when cefquinome concentrations fluctuated between the MIC99 and MPC. Resistant bacteria were selected in vivo when %T > MPC was < 58% of administration interval or %T > MIC99 was ≥70% of administration interval. These findings demonstrate that low-level, cefquinome-resistant S. aureus were selected predominantly when drug concentrations fell inside a concentration window in in vivo model, which was evidenced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. The selection of resistant bacteria arose from both susceptible bacteria being killed and resistant bacteria re-growth. Keeping drug concentrations above the MPC for ≥58% of administration interval provides a strategy to achieve effective antibacterial activity and minimize the emergence of resistance to cefquinome.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancecefquinomePK/PD parametersrabbit tissue-cage infection modelStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID27375594
PMCPMC4896111
OpenAlexW2415502864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.