Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27375517›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2016

Measuring the Performance of Attention Networks with the Dalhousie Computerized Attention Battery (DalCAB): Methodology and Reliability in Healthy Adults.

Stephanie A H Jones, Beverly C Butler, Franziska Kintzel, Anne Johnson, Raymond M Klein, Gail A Eskes

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04010149 (The Impact of Concurrent Brain Stimulation and Working Memory Training on Cognitive Performance in Acquired Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04010149 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Concurrent Brain Stimulation and Working Memory Training on Cognitive Performance in Acquired Brain Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BirminghamRan2019 to 2021Enrolled40ConditionsAcquired Brain InjuryArmsActive tDCS, SHAM tDCS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie A H JonesCognitive Health and Recovery Research Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University Halifax, NS, Canada.
Beverly C ButlerCognitive Health and Recovery Research Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie UniversityHalifax, NS, Canada; Research Services, Nova Scotia Health AuthorityHalifax, NS, Canada.
Franziska KintzelCognitive Health and Recovery Research Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University Halifax, NS, Canada.
Anne JohnsonCognitive Health and Recovery Research Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University Halifax, NS, Canada.
Raymond M KleinCognitive Science Laboratory, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University Halifax, NS, Canada.
Gail A EskesCognitive Health and Recovery Research Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie UniversityHalifax, NS, Canada; Affiliated Scientist, Medical Staff, Nova Scotia Health AuthorityHalifax, NS, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention is an important, multifaceted cognitive domain that has been linked to three distinct, yet interacting, networks: alerting, orienting, and executive control. The measurement of attention and deficits of attention within these networks is critical to the assessment of many neurological and psychiatric conditions in both research and clinical settings. The Dalhousie Computerized Attention Battery (DalCAB) was created to assess attentional functions related to the three attention networks using a range of tasks including: simple reaction time, go/no-go, choice reaction time, dual task, flanker, item and location working memory, and visual search. The current study provides preliminary normative data, test-retest reliability (intraclass correlations) and practice effects in DalCAB performance 24-h after baseline for healthy young adults (n = 96, 18-31 years). Performance on the DalCAB tasks demonstrated Good to Very Good test-retest reliability for mean reaction time, while accuracy and difference measures (e.g., switch costs, interference effects, and working memory load effects) were most reliable for tasks that require more extensive cognitive processing (e.g., choice reaction time, flanker, dual task, and conjunction search). Practice effects were common and pronounced at the 24-h interval. In addition, performance related to specific within-task parameters of the DalCAB sub-tests provides preliminary support for future formal assessment of the convergent validity of our interpretation of the DalCAB as a potential clinical and research assessment tool for measuring aspects of attention related to the alerting, orienting, and executive control networks.

Indexed as

alertingattentioncomputerized assessmentexecutive functionorienting

Identifiers

PMID27375517
PMCPMC4894888
OpenAlexW2474998532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.