Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27375471›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2016

BluePyOpt: Leveraging Open Source Software and Cloud Infrastructure to Optimise Model Parameters in Neuroscience.

Werner Van Geit, Michael Gevaert, Giuseppe Chindemi, Christian Rössert, Jean-Denis Courcol, Eilif B Muller, Felix Schürmann, Idan Segev, Henry Markram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. eFEL: electrophysiology feature extraction library.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Persistent adaptation through dual-timescale regulation of ion channel properties.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Synaptic integration and competition in the substantia nigra pars reticulata-An experimental and in silico analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. WhenAPL bioengineering · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Higher-order interactions in neuronal function: From genes to ionic currents in biophysical models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Werner Van GeitBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Geneva, Switzerland.
Michael GevaertBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Geneva, Switzerland.
Giuseppe ChindemiBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Geneva, Switzerland.
Christian RössertBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Geneva, Switzerland.
Jean-Denis CourcolBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Geneva, Switzerland.
Eilif B MullerBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Geneva, Switzerland.
Felix SchürmannBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Geneva, Switzerland.
Idan SegevDepartment of Neurobiology, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalem, Israel; The Edmond and Lily Safra Centre for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalem, Israel.
Henry MarkramBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneGeneva, Switzerland; Laboratory of Neural Microcircuitry, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At many scales in neuroscience, appropriate mathematical models take the form of complex dynamical systems. Parameterizing such models to conform to the multitude of available experimental constraints is a global non-linear optimisation problem with a complex fitness landscape, requiring numerical techniques to find suitable approximate solutions. Stochastic optimisation approaches, such as evolutionary algorithms, have been shown to be effective, but often the setting up of such optimisations and the choice of a specific search algorithm and its parameters is non-trivial, requiring domain-specific expertise. Here we describe BluePyOpt, a Python package targeted at the broad neuroscience community to simplify this task. BluePyOpt is an extensible framework for data-driven model parameter optimisation that wraps and standardizes several existing open-source tools. It simplifies the task of creating and sharing these optimisations, and the associated techniques and knowledge. This is achieved by abstracting the optimisation and evaluation tasks into various reusable and flexible discrete elements according to established best-practices. Further, BluePyOpt provides methods for setting up both small- and large-scale optimisations on a variety of platforms, ranging from laptops to Linux clusters and cloud-based compute infrastructures. The versatility of the BluePyOpt framework is demonstrated by working through three representative neuroscience specific use cases.

Indexed as

bluepyoptevolutionary algorithmmulti-objectiveneuron modelsopen-sourceoptimisationpythonsynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID27375471
PMCPMC4896051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.