Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27375325›Full record

ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2010

Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: An Insight.

U Raju, V Sondhi, S K Patnaik

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ultrasound of the pediatric chest.The British journal of radiology · 2019
    Review
  7. Golden hour of neonatal life: Need of the hour.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

U RajuAOC, 7 Air Force Hospital, Kanpur.
V SondhiGraded Specialist (Paediatrics), Military Hospital, Ambala.
S K PatnaikGraded Specialist (Paediatrics), Military Hospital, Ambala.
Military Hospital · PKCommand Hospital Air Force · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) is respiratory distress in a newborn baby caused by the presence of meconium in the tracheobronchial airways. The aspiration of meconium stained amniotic fluid by the fetus can happen during antepartum or intrapartum periods and can result in airway obstruction, interference with alveolar gas exchange, chemical pneumonitis as well as surfactant dysfunction. These pulmonary effects cause gross ventilation-perfusion mismatching. To complicate matters further, many infants with MAS have primary or secondary persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn as a result of chronic in utero stress and thickening of the pulmonary vessels. Although meconium is sterile, its presence in the air passages can predispose the infant to pulmonary infection. MAS is essentially a clinical diagnosis and should always be suspected in a child with respiratory distress and meconium-stained amniotic fluid at delivery. Though a known entity for a long time, its management still remains contentious. Intubation and direct tracheal suction is performed when meconium is observed in the amniotic fluid and the infant is not vigorous. Subsequent management involves ventilation, surfactant instillation and lavage, inhaled nitric oxide and high frequency ventilation. The role of steroids continues to be controversial.

Indexed as

AmnioinfusionMeconium aspirationSurfactantTracheal suctionVentilation

Identifiers

PMID27375325
PMCPMC4920933
OpenAlexW1991325773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.