Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27375291›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2017

Two-year longitudinal assessment of physicians' perceptions after replacement of a longstanding homegrown electronic health record: does a J-curve of satisfaction really exist?

David A Hanauer, Greta L Branford, Grant Greenberg, Sharon Kileny, Mick P Couper, Kai Zheng, Sung W Choi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Evaluation of Health Professions Trainee Experiences Transitioning to New VHA Electronic Health Record.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advancing the Science of Electronic Health Record Transitions.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David A HanauerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health System.
Greta L BranfordDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System.
Grant GreenbergDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Health System.
Sharon KilenyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health System.
Mick P CouperInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
Kai ZhengSchool of Information, University of Michigan.
Sung W ChoiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health System.
Michigan Medicine · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Personalized Engagement Tool for Pediatric BMT Patients and CaregiversR21HS023613 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHOI, SUNG WON · 2014 to 2015
$300k
AHRQ HHS R21 HS023613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report describes a 2-year prospective, longitudinal survey of attending physicians in 3 clinical areas (family medicine, general pediatrics, internal medicine) who experienced a transition from a homegrown electronic health record (EHR) to a vendor EHR. Participants were already highly familiar with using EHRs. Data were collected 1 month before and 3, 6, 13, and 25 months post implementation. Our primary goal was to determine if perceptions followed a J-curve pattern in which they initially dropped but eventually surpassed baseline measures. A J-curve was not found for any measures, including workflow, safety, communication, and satisfaction. Only the reminders and alerts measure dropped and then returned to baseline (U-curve); a few remained flatlined. Most dropped and remained below baseline (L-curve). The only measure that remained above baseline was documenting in the exam room with the patient. This study adds to the literature about current controversies surrounding EHR adoption and physician satisfaction.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to ComputersElectronic Health RecordsPhysiciansAmbulatory CareDiffusion of InnovationFamily PracticeHospitals, UniversityHumansInternal MedicineLongitudinal StudiesMichiganPatient SafetyPediatricsWorkflowambulatory careelectronic health recordslongitudinal studiesphysicianssurvey methods

Identifiers

PMID27375291
PMCPMC7299498
OpenAlexW2461735980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.