Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27374766›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Integrated Electrowetting Nanoinjector for Single Cell Transfection.

Elaheh Shekaramiz, Ganeshkumar Varadarajalu, Philip J Day, H Kumar Wickramasinghe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Single molecule delivery into living cells.Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  2. Three-dimensional array of microbubbles sonoporation of cells in microfluidics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Protein fishing from single live cells.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elaheh ShekaramizDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, California, USA.
Ganeshkumar VaradarajaluDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of California Irvine, California, USA.
Philip J DayManchester Institute of Biotechnology, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
H Kumar WickramasingheDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single cell transfection techniques are essential to understand the heterogeneity between cells. We have developed an integrated electrowetting nanoinjector (INENI) to transfect single cells. The high transfection efficiency, controlled dosage delivery and ease of INENI fabrication promote the widespread application of the INENI in cell transfection assays.

Indexed as

Single-Cell AnalysisTransfectionElectrowettingHumansMicroinjections

Identifiers

PMID27374766
PMCPMC4931508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.