Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27374377›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2016

Psychopharmacological Prescriptions in Children and Adolescents in Germany.

Sascha Abbas, Peter Ihle, Jürgen-Bernhard Adler, Susanne Engel, Christian Günster, Roland Linder, Gerd Lehmkuhl, Ingrid Schübert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sascha AbbasPMV Research Group at the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Scientific Institute of the AOK (WIdO, Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK), Berlin, Scientific Institute of the TK for Benefit and Efficiency in Health Care (WINEG, Wissenschaftliches Institut der TK für Nutzen und Effizienz im Gesundheitswesen), Hamburg.
Peter Ihle
Jürgen-Bernhard Adler
Susanne Engel
Christian Günster
Roland Linder
Gerd Lehmkuhl
Ingrid Schübert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn view of the well-known increase in prescriptions of stimulants for children and adolescents over the last 20 years, it is important to study trends in the prevalence and incidence of the use of other psychotropic drugs by this age group as well, to enable an early response to potential problems in the current care situation.

methodsWe used nationwide data from German statutory health insurance funds (Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse [AOK], all insurees; Techniker Kranken - kasse [TK], a 50% randomized sample) concerning all insurees aged 0-17 years (5.0 million people in 2012) to study trends in the prevalence and incidence of psychotropic medication use as well as initially prescribing medical specialties over the period 2004-2012, both for the overall group of psychotropic drugs and for selected subgroups of drugs.

resultsFrom 2004 to 2012, the prevalence of psychotropic drug prescriptions (not including herbal and homeopathic substances) for children and adolescents rose from 19.6 to 27.1 per 1000 individuals. Marked rises were seen for stimulants (10.5 to 19.1 per 1000) and antipsychotic drugs (2.3 to 3.1 per 1000), while the prevalence of antidepressant prescriptions remained constant at about 2 per 1000. The rates of new prescriptions from 2006 to 2012 were generally constant or decreasing; for the overall group of (non-herbal, nonhomeopathic) psychotropic drugs, the rate of new prescriptions fell from 9.9 to 8.7 per 1000. There was a trend toward the issuance of new prescriptions by medical specialists, rather than by family physicians and pediatricians.

conclusionThe observed increased prevalence of psychotropic drug use among children and adolescents appears to be due not to an increased rate of initial prescriptions for these drugs, but rather to a rise in the number of patients who, once having received such drugs, were given further prescriptions for them in the years that followed.

Indexed as

Drug Utilization ReviewAdolescentAdolescent HealthAge DistributionChildChild HealthChild, PreschoolDrug PrescriptionsDrug UtilizationFemaleGermanyHealth Care SurveysHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

PMID27374377
PMCPMC4933807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.